New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Brand Valuation: Financial - Marketing Interface of Metrics

Shigufta Hena Uzma1Naveen Kumar2
Volume 40
Issue 10
Pages 54–62
Year 2010
Published: Oct. 1, 2010
Abstract

The international accounting standards have given brand assets recognition as an intangible asset separating itself from goodwill, though, the U.S. GAAP and the IAS do not recognize internally generated brands as assets (FRS 142, IAS 38). However, if it fulfills these criteria as "identifiable", "controllable" and "liable" to have "future economic benefits" over its "useful life", then it would be recognized as an intangible asset. The controversy that surrounds accounting professions is that though a brand meets the above mentioned criteria, it has so far not been accounted for separately in the balance sheet (Cravens and Guilding, 1999; Mather and Peasnell 1991). Numerous empirical studies have been conducted by financial accounting and marketing researchers to determine approaches of brand valuation. The scope of manipulation and ambiguity draws the reluctance of financial standards to include brand asset valuation on the balance sheet. The biggest challenge comes with regard to the companies accepting the best alternative way for recognizing and accounting intangible assets as "brand". For the last two decades, concepts from the marketing perspective have come up as brand equity (Aaker, 1996) and linking it with customer based brand equity (Keller, 1993). Different dimensions have been considered in measuring brand, and an eventual growth from the term "brand" to "brand equity" has also been incorporated, extending the scope of brand valuation to different measurement metrics. The researchers have again opened up the debate of placing brand assets on the balance sheet (Yeung and Ramasamy, 2007; Keller and Lehmann, 2006). Yeung and Ramasamy, (2007) tried to establish a relation of brand value with firm performance in their study of 50 US companies. They presented that the brand equity and the performance of the firm in the stock market have a strong link. The value relevance of this information and its usefulness would prove successful to place it in the balance sheet. The objective of the first section of the paper is to draw the background for accounting for brands. The second section of the paper is to review the existing approaches for accounting brand from both financial-marketing and marketing perspective and their measurement metrics that can be used in brand valuation the last section deals with discussion and further research to be undertaken.

How to Cite

Shigufta Hena Uzma, Naveen Kumar (2010). Brand Valuation: Financial - Marketing Interface of Metrics. Indian Journal of Marketing, 40(10), 54–62.

Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines