New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Peer Review Policy

Overview

The Indian Journal of Marketing is a double-blind, peer-reviewed refereed monthly journal published in English since 1968. Every manuscript submitted to IJM undergoes a rigorous multi-stage evaluation process to ensure the highest standards of scholarly quality and integrity.

Double-Blind Review Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C ISSN: 0973-8703

The Review Process

Due to the high volume of submissions received, the peer review process at IJM typically takes 8–10 months from initial submission to a final decision.
1

Initial Desk Review

Upon submission, the editorial team assesses the manuscript for suitability — scope alignment, formatting compliance, and minimum scholarly standards. Papers that do not meet these criteria are rejected at this stage without being sent for peer review.

2

Plagiarism Check

All manuscripts are screened using specialised anti-plagiarism software. Submissions with unacceptable levels of similarity to existing published work are returned to the author or rejected outright.

3

Assignment to Reviewers

Manuscripts that pass the desk review and plagiarism check are assigned to a minimum of two independent subject-matter experts. Both the author and reviewer identities are concealed throughout the process (double-blind).

4

Expert Peer Review

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript against established criteria (see Review Criteria below) and provide structured feedback. They recommend one of the following outcomes: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

5

Editorial Decision

The Editor-in-Chief reviews the consolidated reviewer feedback and makes an editorial decision. In cases of divergent reviewer opinions, a third reviewer may be consulted.

6

Revision Rounds

Accepted manuscripts typically undergo 2–3 rounds of revision. Authors are required to address all points raised by the Editor and Reviewers and clearly highlight major revisions in the manuscript using red font colour.

7

Revised Manuscript Re-review

Revised submissions are sent back to the original reviewers for assessment of whether the authors have adequately addressed the requested changes. This cycle continues until the manuscript is deemed acceptable.

8

Final Acceptance

Once all reviewers and the Editor are satisfied with the manuscript, a formal letter of acceptance is issued to the corresponding author.

9

Copy Editing & Production

The accepted manuscript undergoes professional copy editing to ensure compliance with IJM's language, style, and formatting standards before typesetting.

10

Publication

The final typeset manuscript is assigned a DOI and published in the relevant monthly issue of the Indian Journal of Marketing.

Review Criteria

Contribution to Marketing

The extent to which the manuscript advances knowledge in the field of marketing, management, or related disciplines and offers actionable insights.

Originality

Whether the study presents a genuinely novel research question, methodology, or finding that has not been previously published or substantially reproduced.

Literature Review

Adequacy and currency of the literature reviewed, and whether the paper is correctly positioned within the existing body of knowledge.

Conceptual & Methodological Rigour

Soundness of the conceptual framework, research design, data collection, statistical analysis, and validity of conclusions drawn.

Quality of Writing

Clarity, coherence, and logical organisation of the manuscript, including abstract quality, language standards, and adherence to IJM's style guidelines.

Managerial Implications

The practical relevance of the findings for marketing practitioners, business managers, and policy-makers, in addition to the academic contribution.

Ethical Disclosures

Appropriate disclosure of funding sources, conflicts of interest, institutional ethics approvals (where applicable), and data availability statements.

Scope Alignment

Whether the manuscript fits within the stated aims and scope of the Indian Journal of Marketing as a peer-reviewed scholarly publication.

Revision Guidelines for Authors

  • Address all points raised by the Editor and Reviewers in a point-by-point response letter.
  • Clearly show all major revisions in the manuscript using red font colour only. Do not use track changes or other markup modes.
  • Submit the revised manuscript within the deadline communicated by the editorial office.
  • If you disagree with a reviewer comment, provide a clear, evidence-based justification rather than simply declining to revise.
  • Ensure that all co-authors have read and approved the revised manuscript before re-submission.

For queries regarding the review process, contact the Editorial Office:

Email: [email protected]  |  Phone: +91 9667428899