Consumer innovativeness has recently caught the attention of Indian marketing academics due to rapid adoption of high tech products and services like laptop computers, tablets, DVDs, mobile phones, and cable TV providers. Companies are spending heavily on brand promotion and advertising to attract new customers. This research paper studied consumer innovativeness and lead user status (LUS) in adopting new products and services in Indian rural markets. Lead users are defined as customers at the leading edge of the market and who have a high incentive to adopt a new innovation. In earlier research studies, a construct like 'lead user status' was developed as a bimodal and discrete variable. This paper advanced the idea of lead user through redefining and validating the construct as a leading edge status (LES) and adapting the same to the Indian rural market context as a continuous variable. This helped in comparing LES with other behavioural adoption traits like individual dispositional innovativeness (IDI) and time of adoption (TOA) from the seminal work of Rogers (1962). This paper also studied the mediating effect of LES with the traditional measures like IDI, TOA, and other general characteristics by application of route path analysis in LISREL. A pairwise correlation also revealed interesting patterns among LES, IDI, and TOA and with demographic and psychographic consumer traits. The study validated a continuous construct of LES and further established that LES assumed a mediating role in explaining consumer innovativeness and adoption behaviour.

1. Baldwin, C., & Von Hippel, E. (2011). Modelling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399 - 1417.
2. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator - mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173 - 1182.
3. Bergkvist, L. (2015). Appropriate use of single - item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters : A Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(3), 245 - 255.
4. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175 - 184.
5. Bhattacharya, S., & Roy, S. (2014). Rural consumer behavior and strategic marketing innovations: An exploratory study in Eastern India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 44(2), 15 - 25. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2014/v44/i2/80443
6. Bilgram, V., Brem, A., & Voigt, K. I. (2013). User - centric innovations in new product development – systematic identification of lead users harnessing interactive and collaborative online - tools. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 419 - 458.
7. Brem, A., Bilgram, V., & Gutstein, A. (2018). Involving lead users in innovation: A structured summary of research on the lead user method. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 15(3), 55 - 72.
8. Ernst, M., & Brem, A. (2017). Social media for identifying lead users ? Insights into lead users' social media habits. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 14(4), 1 - 21.
9. Ernst, M., Brem, A., & Voigt, K.I. (2014). Innovation management, lead - users, and social media - Introduction of a conceptual framework for integrating social media tools in lead-user management. In (ed.) Social media in strategic management (Advanced series in management, Volume 11, pp. 169 - 195). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1108/S1877-6361(2013)0000011013
10. Foxall, G. R. (1989). User initiated product innovations. Industrial Marketing Management, 18 (2), 95 - 104.
11. Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2001). How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end users. Research Policy, 32 (1), 157 - 178.
12. Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead - user theory. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23 (4), 301 - 315.
13. Gupta, R., Sankhe, S., Dobbs, R., Woetzel, J., Madgavkar, A., & Hasyagar, A. (2014). From poverty to empowerment: India’s imperative for jobs, growth, and effective basic services. McKinsey Global Institute Report. Retrieved from <a href=https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi on 21/05/2018 target="_blank">https://www.mckinsey.com/mgi on 21/05/2018 </a>
14. Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & Von Krogh, G. (2010). Under the radar : Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 39(9), 1198 - 1213.
15. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R.R., Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th edition). NY, New York : MacMillan Publishing Company.
16. Herstatt, C., & von Hippel, E. (1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method - A case study in a "low tech" field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213 - 221.
17. Jeppesen, L. B., & Laursen, K. (2009). The role of lead users in knowledge sharing. Research Policy, 38(10), 1582 - 1589.
18. Kamakura, W.A. (2014). Measure twice and cut once: The carpenter’s rule still applies. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 237 - 243.
19. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. (2010). Winning in emerging markets: A road map for strategy and execution. Cambridge MA : Harvard Business Press.
20. Leary, A., & Kaulartz, S. (2019). Introducing the new era of lead user innovation. IPSOS Views. Retrieved from <a href=https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2019-01/new-era-of-lead-user innovation.pdf target="_blank">https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2019-01/new-era-of-lead-user innovation.pdf </a>
21. Lilien, G., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea - generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48 (8), 1042 - 1059.
22. Lindell, M. K., & Whitney, D. J. (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (1), 114 - 121.
23. Mahr, D., & Lievens, A. (2012). Virtual lead user communities: Drivers of knowledge creation for innovation. Research Policy, 41(1), 167 - 177.
24. Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research: A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science, 52 (12), 1865 - 1883.
25. Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G.R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (4), 229 - 242.
26. Morrison, P. D, Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2002). The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge (Working Paper 91/Mkt). INSEAD, France. Retrieved from <a href=https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2002/2002-110.pdf target="_blank">https://flora.insead.edu/fichiersti_wp/inseadwp2002/2002-110.pdf </a>
27. on 18/05/2018
28. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2004). The nature of lead users and measurement of leading-edge status. Research Policy, 33 (2), 351 - 362.
29. Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J.H., & von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513 - 1641.
30. Rajan, C.R., & Xavier, M.J. (2015). Marketing innovation in partnership with self help groups : A case study of a farm inputs manufacturer. Indian Journal of Marketing, 45(8), 7-17. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2015/v45/i8/79914
31. Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations (1st edition). New York : The Free Press.
32. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed). New York : The Free Press.
33. Rossiter, J. R. (2010). Marketing measurement revolution: C-OAR-SE to replace psychometrics. Transfer - Werbeforschung & Praxis, 56(4), 66 - 72.
34. Schreier, M., & Prügl, R. (2008). Extending lead-user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers' lead userness. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(4), 331 - 346.
35. Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007). Lead users and the adoption and diffusion of new products: Insights from two extreme sports communities. Marketing Letters, 18(1 - 2), 15 - 30.
36. Shah, S. (1999). Sources and patterns of innovation in a consumer product field : Innovations in sporting equipment. MIT Sloan School of Management, 410, 1231 -1252.
37. Shah, S.K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1-2), 123 - 140.
38. Shaw, B. (1985). The role of the interaction between the user and the manufacturer in medical equipment innovation. R& D Management, 15(4), 283 - 292.
39. Simbeck, K. (2013). Opinion leaders and lead users in marketing and management accounting and impact on small business performance. Social Networking, 2(1), 9 - 18. doi: 10.4236/sn.2013.21002
40. Thomke, S., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Customers as innovators: A new way to create value. Harvard Business Review, 80(4), 74 - 81.
41. Trondsen, T. J. (1996). Some characteristics of adopters of a major innovation in the computer field and of potential use in marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 567 - 576.
42. Urban, G. L., & von Hippel, E. (1988). Lead user analyses : For the development of new industrial products. Management Science, 34(5), 555 - 677.
43. Vanhaverbeke, W., & Du, J. (2010). Reframing the role of lead users in radical innovations: An open innovation perspective. International Journal of Business Environment, 3(2), 202 - 220.
44. Venkataraman, N., & Raman, S. (2016). Impact of user-generated content on purchase intention for fashion products : A study on women consumers in Bangalore. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46(7), 23 - 35. doi:10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i7/97125
45. von Hippel, E. (1978). Successful industrial products from customer ideas. Journal of Marketing, 42(1), 39 - 49.
46. von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 773 - 907.
47. von Hippel, E. (1988). The source of innovation. New York : Oxford University Press.
48. von Hippel, E., & Katz, R. (2002). Shifting innovation to users via toolkits. Management Science, 48(7), 821 - 833.
49. Yadav, V., & Goyal, P. (2015). User innovation and entrepreneurship: Case studies from rural India. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 4(5), 1 - 20.