Purpose: In contrast to return behavior, consumer purchasing behavior is thoroughly investigated. Returns have increased in tandem with the growth of online shopping through e-commerce sites, particularly in emerging nations like India. The present study aimed to determine whether there are any prevailing behavioral features associated with customer returns, given the disproportionate number of returns that India receives in comparison to other nations. The body of existing studies has not sufficiently examined product returns resulting from internet sales. Investigating the expanding e-commerce sector and the unprofitability of these businesses in the context of emerging markets requires research.

Methodology: A systematic online questionnaire survey was used to gather information on a variety of topics related to returns after purchases, including delivery experiences, product dissonance, information search, product attributes and categories, and demographics. Outcome factors included the size of the returns and the frequency of returns.

Findings: This research concluded that the following elements can be used to explain product return behavior in online purchases: situational circumstances, impulse, experimenting with new products, volition, unethical behavior, seasonal purchases, purchases prompted by promotions, and enforced options. In addition to these, dissonance, delivery encounters, information behavior, and productspecific factors — all played a big role in online purchase returns. The frequency, variety, and mechanism of reimbursement of returns for internet purchases varied greatly.

Originality: To have a better understanding of the return behavior, this research took into account factors such as income, monthly expenses, and spending on online goods.Managerial

Implications: Understanding the return behavior could help influence customer purchases, returns, and retention. Managers could control and manage the factors influencing returns at a desired level.

1. Abbey, J., Ketzenberg, M., & Metters, R. (2018, July 23). A more profitable approach to product returns. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(1), 1–6.
2. Altug, M. S., & Aydinliyim, T. (2016). Counteracting strategic purchase deferrals: The impact of online retailers' return policy decisions. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 18(3), 309–460. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2015.0570
3. Autry, C. W., Hill, D. J., & O'Brien, M. (2007). Attitude toward the customer: A study of product returns episodes. Journal of Managerial Issues, 19(3), 315–339. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604572
4. Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). The poverty of economic explanations of consumption and an action theory alternative. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21(3–4), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.975
5. Bagozzi, R., Gurhan-Canli, Z., & Priester, J. R. (2002). The social psychology of consumer behaviour. McGraw-Hill Education.
6. Barker, T. J., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2008). Reverse logistics network design: A conceptual framework for decision making. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1(4), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397030802591196
7. Bechwati, N. N., & Siegal, W. S. (2005). The impact of the prechoice process on product returns. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.2005.42.3.358
8. Buhler, B. (2018). Returns, the value conundrum: Accenture post & parcel industry research 2018. Accenture. https://www.slideshare.net/accenture/returns-the-value-conundrumaccenture- post-parcel-industry-research-2018
9. Cook, S. C., & Yurchisin, J. (2017). Fast fashion environments: Consumer's heaven or retailer's nightmare? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-03-2016-0027
10. Cui, H., Rajagopalan, S., & Ward, A. R. (2020). Impact of task-level worker specialization, workload, and product personalization on consumer returns. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 23(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2019.0836
11. Dailey, L. C., & Ülkü, M. A. (2018). Retailers beware: On denied product returns and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 86, 202–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.064
12. Das, P., Kar, B., & Misra, S. N. (2022). Information processing style and e-commerce website design: A clustering-based conjoint approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 4, 63–74. https://doi.org/10.37534/bp.jhssr.2022.v4.nS
13. Dzyabura, D., El Kihal, S., Hauser, J. R., & Ibragimov, M. (2023). Leveraging the power of images in managing product return rates. Marketing Science, 42(6), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2023.1451
14. El Kihal, S., & Shehu, E. (2022). It's not only what they buy, it's also what they keep: Linking marketing instruments to product returns. Journal of Retailing, 98(3), 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2022.01.002
15. Foscht, T., Ernstreiter, K., Maloles, C., Sinha, I., & Swoboda, B. (2013). Retaining or returning? Some insights for a better understanding of return behaviour. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(2), 113–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590551311304310
16. Ganguly, P. (2016, November 22). E-commerce players in India bring down product returns this festive seasons. The Economic Times. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/e-commerce-players-in-indiabring- down-product-returns-this-festive-season/55553507
17. Gelbrich, K., Gäthke, J., & Hübner, A. (2017). Rewarding customers who keep a product: How reinforcement affects customers' product return decision in online retailing. Psychology & Marketing, 34(9), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21027
18. Gould, S. J., Houston, F. S., & Mundt, J. (1997). Failing to try to consume: A reversal of the usual consumer research perspective. In M. Brucks & J. Deborah (eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 24, pp. 211–216). Association for Consumer Research. https://www.acrwebsite.org/volumes/8042/volumes/v24/NA-24/full
19. Griffis, S. E., Rao, S., Goldsby, T. J., & Niranjan, T. T. (2012). The customer consequences of returns in online retailing: An empirical analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2012.02.002
20. Gupta, P., Singh, S., Ranjan, R., Kharayat, G., Raman, S., & Balaji, V. (2021). Analysis of delivery issues that customer face upon e-commerce shopping. International Journal of Management Studies, 6(3), 14–26. https://researchersworld.com/index.php/ijms/article/view/1061
21. Han, Y., Chandukala, S. R., & Che, H. (2017). Exchange and refund of complementary products. Marketing Letters, 28, 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9393-7
22. Hansen, H., Samuelsen, B. M., & Andreassen, T. W. (2011). Trying to complain: The impact of self-referencing on complaining intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(4), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2010.00948.x
23. Harris, L. C. (2008). Fraudulent return proclivity: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing, 84(4), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2008.09.003
24. Hellemann, N. J., & Brettel, M. (2016). The impact of website stimuli on product returns in online retailing: A structured abstract. In K. Kim (eds.), Celebrating America's pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 71–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26647-3_10
25. Jack, L., Frei, R., & Krzyzaniak, S.-A. (2019). Buy online, return in store: The challenges and opportunities of product returns in a multichannel environment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334536583_Buy_online_return_to_store_the_ch allenges_and_opportunities_of_product_returns_in_a_multichannel_environment
26. Jain, K., Gautam, S., & Pasricha, D. (2018). The pleasure and the guilt - Impulse purchase and post purchase regret: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121984
27. Jaiswal, A. K., Niraj, R., Park, C. H., & Agarwal, M. K. (2018). The effect of relationship and transactional characteristics on customer retention in emerging online markets. Journal of Business Research, 92, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.007
28. Janakiraman, N., & Ordóñez, L. (2012). Effect of effort and deadlines on consumer product returns. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.05.002
29. Kar, B., Kar, S., & Tripathy, S. (2022). Product return in online purchase and demography: Ecommerce scenario in India. In S. Bilgaiyan, J. Singh, & H. Das (eds.), Empirical research for futuristic e-commerce systems: Foundations and applications (pp. 196–212). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4969-1.ch010
30. Kar, B., Tripathy, A., & Pathak, M. D. (2022). What causes product returns in online purchases? A review and research agenda. Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 15(4), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.17010/PIJOM/2022/V15I4/162837
31. Kar, S. S., & Sahoo, S. K. (2009). Organised retailing in India: Issues and challenges. Indian Journal of Marketing, 39(11), 10–14. https://www.geosocindia.org/index.php/ijom/article/view/37102
32. Khare, A., Khare, A., Mukherjee, S., & Goyal, T. (2016). Do consumer shopping styles influence consumer attitudes toward services offered by shopping websites? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 28(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2015.1072075
33. Kincade, D. H., Giddings, V. L., & Chen-Yu, H. J. (1998). Impact of product-specific variables on consumers' post-consumption behaviour for apparel products: USA. Journal of Consumer Studies & Home Economics, 22(2), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470- 6431.1998.tb00718.x
34. King, T., Dennis, C., & Wright, L. T. (2008). Myopia, customer returns and the theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(1–2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725708X273993
35. Koufaris, M., Kambil, A., & Labarbera, P. A. (2001). Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2001.11044233
36. Kumar, A., & Anjaly, B. (2017). How to measure post-purchase customer experience in online retailing? A scale development study. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(12), 1277–1297. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2017-0002
37. Kumar, N., & Gupta, U. (2017). Factors influencing online purchase behaviour of customers in Tier III cities of India - A factor analysis approach. International Journal of Marketing & Business Communication, 6(1), 29–36.
38. Lee, S., & Yi, Y. (2017). “Seize the deal, or return it losing your free gift”: The effect of a giftwith- purchase promotion on product return intention. Psychology & Marketing, 34(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20986
39. Lepthien, A., & Clement, M. (2019). Shipping fee schedules and return behavior. Marketing Letters, 30(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-019-09486-8
40. Li, Y., Xu, L., & Li, D. (2013). Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.03.013
41. Lohse, T., Kemper, J., & Brettel, M. (2017). How online customer reviews affect sales and return behavior – An empirical analysis in fashion e-commerce. In, Proceedings of the 25th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS) (pp. 2635–2644). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2017_rip/16
42. Martin, M. J. (2016). Customers' determination of service quality and satisfaction in a return/repair process: A quantitative study. International Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 20(1), 36–52.
43. Minnema, A., Bijmolt, T. H., Petersen, J. A., & Shulman, J. D. (2018). Managing product returns within the customer value framework. In R. Palmatier, V. Kumar, & C. Harmeling (eds.), Customer engagement marketing (pp. 95–118). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61985-9_5
44. Misra, S., & Arivazhagan, D. (2017). Application of design thinking techniques in marketing of fashion apparel e-commerce. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(8), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.17010/IJOM/2017/V47/I8/117430
45. Narvar. (2018). The state of returns: What today's shoppers expect (Narvar Consumer Report). https://corp.narvar.com/resources/state-of-returns-consumer-report-2018
46. Pei, Z., & Paswan, A. (2018). Consumers' legitimate and opportunistic product return behaviors in online shopping. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 19(4), 301–319. http://www.jecr.org/node/563
47. Petersen, J. A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Are product returns a necessary evil? Antecedents and consequences. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.3.35
48. Pham, T. S., & Ahammad, M. F. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of online customer satisfaction: A holistic process perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 124, 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.003
49. Powers, T. L., & Jack, E. P. (2013). The influence of cognitive dissonance on retail product returns. Psychology & Marketing, 30(8), 724–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20640
50. Powers, T. L., & Jack, E. P. (2015). Understanding the causes of retail product returns. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(12), 1182–1202. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-02-2014-0023
51. Powers, T. L., & Lord, J. C. (2018). An examination of retail product return behavior based on category of good: An abstract. In P. Rossi & N. Krey (eds.), Marketing transformation: Marketing practice in an ever changing world. AMSWMC 2017. Developments in marketing science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 101–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68750-6_29
52. Radhi, M., & Zhang, G. (2018). Pricing policies for a dual-channel retailer with cross-channel returns. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.020
53. Rao, S., Rabinovich, E., & Raju, D. (2014). The role of physical distribution services as determinants of product returns in Internet retailing. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.005
54. Rosenbaum, M. S., & Kuntze, R. (2003). The relationship between anomie and unethical retail disposition. Psychology & Marketing, 20(12), 1067–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10109
55. Saarijärvi, H., Sutinen, U.-M., & Harris, L. C. (2017). Uncovering consumers' returning behaviour: A study of fashion e-commerce. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 27(3), 284–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2017.1314863
56. Sahoo, N., Dellarocas, C., & Srinivasan, S. (2018). The impact of online product reviews on product returns. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2017.0736
57. Salema, M. I., Barbosa-Povoa, A. P., & Novais, A. Q. (2010). Simultaneous design and planning of supply chains with reverse flows: A generic modelling framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(2), 336–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJOR.2009.08.002
58. Samorani, M., Alptekinoglu, A., & Messinger, P. R. (2019). Product return episodes in retailing. Service Science, 11(4), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1287/SERV.2019.0250
59. Seeger, M. K., Kemper, J., & Brettel, M. (2019). How information processing and mobile channel choice influence product returns: An empirical analysis. Psychology & Marketing, 36(3), 198–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21170
60. Seo, J. Y., Yoon, S., & Vangelova, M. (2016). Shopping plans, buying motivations, and return policies: Impacts on product returns and purchase likelihoods. Marketing Letters, 27(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9381-y
61. Stammerjohan, C., & Webster, C. (2002). Trait and situational antecedents to nonconsumption. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), 126–132.
62. Variyar, M. (2018, December 5). Amazon gets more product returns in India than any other markets. The Economic Times. https://tech.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/internet/amazon-gets-more-productreturns- in-india-than-any-other-markets/66946547
63. Walsh, G., & Brylla, D. (2017). Do product returns hurt relational outcomes? Some evidence from online retailing. Electronic Markets, 27(4), 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525- 016-0240-3
64. Walsh, G., Albrecht, A. K., Kunz, W., & Hofacker, C. F. (2016). Relationship between online retailers' reputation and product returns. British Journal of Management, 27(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12120
65. Xu, L., Li, Y., Govindan, K., & Xu, X. (2015). Consumer returns policies with endogenous deadline and supply chain coordination. European Journal of Operational Research, 242(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.09.049
66. Xu, X., & Jackson, J. E. (2019). Investigating the influential factors of return channel loyalty in omni-channel retailing. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.011
67. Yan, R., & Cao, Z. (2017). Product returns, asymmetric information, and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.01.001
68. Zhang, Y., Voorhees, C. M., Lin, C., Chiang, J., Hult, G. T., & Calantone, R. J. (2022). Information search and product returns across mobile and traditional online channels. Journal of Retailing, 98(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.05.001
69. Zhou, W., & Hinz, O. (2016). Determining profit-optimizing return policies – a two–step approach on data from taobao.com. Electronic Markets, 26(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0198-6
70. Zhou, W., Hinz, O., & Benlian, A. (2018). The impact of the package opening process on product returns. Business Research, 11(2), 279–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017- 0055-x
71. Ziamou, P., Gould, S., & Venkatesh, A. (2012). “Am I Getting It or Not?” The practices involved in “Trying to consume” a new technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00891.x