New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

How Far Does Cognitive Depletion Impact Cinderella Shopping? Mediation Through Hedonic and Utilitarian Value Perceptions

Jasmine V. M.1Nithin Jose2Sruthiya V. N.3

1 Assistant Professor, P.G. & Research Department of Commerce, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Kozhikode - 673 008, Kerala

2 Assistant Professor, P.G. & Research Department of Commerce, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Kozhikode - 673 008, Kerala

3 Assistant Professor, P.G. & Research Department of Commerce, St. Joseph’s College (Autonomous), Devagiri, Kozhikode - 673 008, Kerala

Volume 54
Issue 6
Pages 8–28
Year 2024
Received: Aug. 25, 2023 Accepted: April 20, 2024 Published: June 29, 2024
Abstract

Purpose: The present study examined the online midnight time-bounded shopping habit, the Cinderella shopping behavior. This growing trend among online consumers, followed by sales promotional offers, induced us to discover the direct effects of cognitive depletion on hedonic value perception, utilitarian value perception, and attitude, leading to the Cinderella shopping habit. Moreover, we tried to measure the indirect effect of cognitive depletion on attitude mediated through hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions.Design/Methodology/Approach : This empirical research undertook four independent latent variables, namely cognitive depletion, hedonic value perception, utilitarian value perception, and attitude, and one dependent variable—“Cinderella Shopping Habit.” For the study, we applied purposive sampling, floated a structured questionnaire, received 400 responses, and ran the analysis on Jamovi software.

Findings: We found that cognitive deletion has a significant positive influence on hedonic value perception, utilitarian value perception, and attitude. Similarly, hedonic and utilitarian value perceptions showed a significant partial mediation effect in the relationship between cognitive depletion and attitude. Finally, the attitude framed on the above constructs impacted the Cinderella shopping habit.Practical

Implications: It is recommended that marketers and webpreneurs utilize the new movement in online shopping behavior wisely, considering the variables identified here. Though our study has its limitations, it allows scope for future researchers—variations in the effect of cognitive depletion on late-night shopping among consumers of different categories and products can be studied in the future.Originality/

Value: Unlike prior research, the current work builds a model to examine midnight timebounded online consumer behavior by focusing on cognitive depletion.

Keywords attitude Cinderella shopping cognitive depletion hedonic value perception utilitarian value perception
How to Cite

Jasmine V. M., Nithin Jose, Sruthiya V. N. (2024). How Far Does Cognitive Depletion Impact Cinderella Shopping? Mediation Through Hedonic and Utilitarian Value Perceptions. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(6), 8–28. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i6/173944

References
  1. Abdelkhair, F. Y., Babekir, M. Y., Mudawi, S. S., & Abiad, A. B. (2023). Sales promotion and impulse buying behavior towards consumer goods: The mediating role of purchase intention. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i2/172631
  2. Alhola, P., & Polo-Kantola, P. (2007). Sleep deprivation: Impact on cognitive performance. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 3(5), 553–567. https://doi.org/10.2147/ndt.s12160203
  3. Atkins, K. G., & Hyun, S.-Y. (2016). Smart shoppers' purchasing experiences: Functions of product type, gender, and generation. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v8n2p1
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421–458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
  5. Bandyopadhyay, N., Sivakumaran, B., Patro, S., & Kumar, R. S. (2021). Immediate or delayed! Whether various types of consumer sales promotions drive impulse buying?: An empirical investigation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102532
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1252
  7. Bei, L.-T., & Chen, M.-Y. (2015). The effects of hedonic and utilitarian bidding values on e-auction behavior. Electronic Commerce Research, 15, 483–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-015-9197-0
  8. Calvo, M. G., & Gutiérrez-García, A. (2016). Chapter 16 - Cognition and stress. In Stress: Concepts, cognition, emotion, and behavior (pp. 139–144). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00016-9
  9. Chen, H.-S., Liang, C.-H., Liao, S.-Y., & Kuo, H.-Y. (2020). Consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward food delivery platform services. Sustainability, 12(23), 10177. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310177
  10. Chetioui, Y., & El Bouzidi, L. (2023). An investigation of the nexus between online impulsive buying and cognitive dissonance among Gen Z shoppers: Are female shoppers different? Young Consumers, 24(4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-06-2022-1548
  11. Childers, T. L., Carr, C. L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
  12. Chiou, J.-S., & Ting, C.-C. (2011). Will you spend more money and time on internet shopping when the product and situation are right? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 203–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.037
  13. Chiu, C.-M., Wang, E. T., Fang, Y.-H., & Huang, H.-Y. (2014). Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: The roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value, and perceived risk. Information Systems Journal, 24(1), 85–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x
  14. Caesar, C. (2023, November 9). Unusual shopping behaviours beyond drunk shopping and midnight splurges. Salsify. https://www.salsify.com/blog/unusual-shopping-behaviorsdrunk-midnight-shopping
  15. Chung, Y.-S. (2015). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping values in airport shopping behavior. Journal of Air Transport Management, 49, 28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.07.003
  16. Coyne, J. C., & Gotlib, I. H. (1983). The role of cognition in depression: A critical appraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 94(3), 472–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.3.472
  17. Dangi, N., Narula, S. A., & Gupta, S. K. (2020). Influences on purchase intentions of organic food consumers in an emerging economy. Journal of Asia Business Studies, 14(5), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-12-2019-0364
  18. Das, G., Mukherjee, A., & Smith, R. J. (2018). The perfect fit: The moderating role of selling cues on hedonic and utilitarian product types. Journal of Retailing, 94(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.12.002
  19. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  20. Djelassi, S., Godefroit-Winkel, D., & Diallo, M. F. (2018). Does culture affect the relationships among utilitarian and non-utilitarian values, satisfaction, and loyalty to shopping centers? Evidence from two Maghreb countries. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 46(11–12), 1153–1169. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2017-0131
  21. Engin, A., & Vetschera, R. (2017). Information representation in decision making: The impact of cognitive style and depletion effects. Decision Support Systems, 103, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2017.09.007
  22. Fechner, H. B., Schooler, L. J., & Pachur, T. (2018). Cognitive costs of decision-makingstrategies: A resource demand decomposition analysis with a cognitive architecture. Cognition, 170, 102–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.003
  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  24. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research, 69(8), 3192–3198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
  25. Geiger, S. (2007). Exploring night-time grocery shopping behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2006.03.001
  26. Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130
  27. Halkiopoulos, C., Antonopoulou, H., Gkintoni, E., & Aroutzidis, A. (2022). Neuromarketing as an indicator of cognitive consumer behavior in decision-making process of tourism destination — An overview. In V. Katsoni & A. C. Şerban (eds.), Transcending borders in tourism through innovation and cultural heritage (pp. 679–697). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92491-1_41
  28. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298204600314
  29. Izogo, E. E., & Jayawardhena, C. (2018). Online shopping experience in an emerging eretailing market. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2017-0015
  30. Jacoby, J. (1984). Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 432−435. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2488912
  31. Jain, K., Gautam, S., & Pasricha, D. (2018). The pleasure and the guilt - Impulse purchase and post purchase regret: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(3), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i3/121984
  32. Jee, T. W. (2021). The perception of discount sales promotions – A utilitarian and hedonic perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102745
  33. Johnson, E. J. (2008). Man, my brain is tired: Linking depletion and cognitive effort in choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(1), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.003
  34. Johnson, E. J., & Payne, J. W. (1985). Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Science, 31(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.4.395
  35. Kawachi, I., & Berkman, L. F. (2001). Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health, 78, 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1093/jurban/78.3.458
  36. Kivetz, R., & Zheng, Y. (2017). The effects of promotions on hedonic versus utilitarian purchases. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.005
  37. Kusumawardani, K. A., Widyanto, H. A., & Tambunan, J. E. (2023). The role of gamification, social, hedonic and utilitarian values on e-commerce adoption. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(2), 158–177. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJME-09-2022-0188
  38. La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2022). Instrumental vs. experiential attitudes in the theory of planned behaviour: Two studies on intention to perform a recommended amount of physical activity. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2022.2161107
  39. Lawrie, E., Hay, L., & Wodehouse, A. (2023). A classification of methods and constructs in design cognition research. In J. S. Gero (ed.), Design Computing and Cognition'22 (pp. 97–114). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20418-0_7
  40. Lee, C.-H., & Wu, J. J. (2017). Consumer online flow experience: The relationship between utilitarian and hedonic value, satisfaction and unplanned purchase. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(10), 2452–2467. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2016-0500
  41. Li, T., Li, W., Zhao, Y., & Ma, J. (2023). Rationality manipulation during consumer decisionmaking process: An analysis of Alibaba's online shopping carnival. Electronic Commerce Research, 23(1), 331–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-022-09567-3
  42. Li, X., Zhao, X., Xu, W., & Pu, W. (2020). Measuring ease of use of mobile applications in ecommerce retailing from the perspective of consumer online shopping behaviour patterns. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102093
  43. Lu, J., Liu, Z., & Fang, Z. (2016). Hedonic products for you, utilitarian products for me. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(4), 332–341. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500003764
  44. Mishra, S., & Kar, B. (2023). Exploring compassion-buying behavior among demographic segments during COVID-19. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(5), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i5/172726
  45. Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical view. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214
  46. Ozkara, B. Y., Ozmen, M., & Kim, J. W. (2017). Examining the effect of flow experience on online purchase: A novel approach to the flow theory based on hedonic and utilitarian value. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37, 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.04.001
  47. Pahari, S., Ghosal, I., Prasad, B., & Dildar, S. M. (2023). Which determinants impact consumer purchase behavior toward online purchasing of organic food products? Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 16(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2023/v16i1/172667
  48. Pang, H. (2021). Identifying associations between mobile social media users' perceived values, attitude, satisfaction, and eWOM engagement: The moderating role of affective factors. Telematics and Informatics, 59, 101561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101561
  49. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Gregory, R. (1999). Measuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code. In B. Fischhoff & C. F. Manski (eds.), Elicitation of preferences (pp. 243–275). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1406-8_9
  50. Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
  51. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  52. Rabipour, S., Mahmood, E. A., Afsharkhas, M., & Abbasi, V. (2022). Cannabinoids impact on cognition: A review from the neurobiological perspective. Chemical Review and Letters, 6(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.22034/CRL.2022.347354.1174
  53. Rafael, D. N., & Lopes, E. L. (2023). Ego depletion in consumer behavior: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(3), 755–781. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2148
  54. Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Sinkovics, N., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2023). A perspective on using partial least squares structural equation modeling in data articles. Data in Brief, 48, 109074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2023.109074
  55. Saptono, L., Soetjipto, B. E., Wahjoedi, & Wahyono, H. (2019). The influence of financial quantitative literacy and subjective numeracy on impulsive consumption with materialism as the mediator variable. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(10), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i10/147563
  56. Sarkar, M. B., Echambadi, R., & Harrison, J. S. (2001). Alliance entrepreneurship and firm market performance. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.179
  57. Schmidt, C., Collette, F., Cajochen, C., & Peigneux, P. (2007). A time to think: Circadian rhythms in human cognition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(7), 755–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701754158
  58. Sen, S. (2023). Developing the M-H-IB model to explain the mediational role of hedonism on materialism and impulse buying relationship: Proposing a research framework. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i4/172690
  59. Sharma, P., Gupta, S., & Kapoor, D. (2020). Digital marketing and consumer millennials: A comparative study of men, women, and transgender consumers' buying behaviour in Punjab. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i3/151029
  60. Shihab, M. R., & Putri, A. P. (2019). Negative online reviews of popular products: Understanding the effects of review proportion and quality on consumers' attitude and intention to buy. Electronic Commerce Research, 19, 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9294-y
  61. Sinha, S. K., & Verma, P. (2020). Impact of sales promotion's benefits on perceived value: Does product category moderate the results? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101887
  62. Tabor, E. (n.d.). Cindrella shopping: How to coach yourself up for this new trend. Media Monks. https://media.monks.com/articles/cinderella-shopping-how-coach-yourself-newtrend
  63. Tomar, R. S., Tomar, D., & Tomar, V. S. (2023). Impulsive buying among youth: A dominating component of compulsive buying behavior. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(10), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i10/171988
  64. Tomar, V. S., Sharma, A., & Pandey, N. (2018). Perceived benefits of online shopping : Scale modification and validation. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(12), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i12/139553
  65. Tsai, Y.-T., & Tiwasing, P. (2021). Customer's intention to adopt smart lockers in last-mile delivery service: A multi-theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 102514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102514
  66. Tuttle, B. (2019, September 12). Why you're buying stuff on your phone at 2 a.m. Instead of sleeping, according to a consumer psychologist. Money Group. https://money.com/onlineshopping-late-night-impulse-buy-stress/
  67. Wagner, G., Schramm-Klein, H., & Steinmann, S. (2020). Online retailing across e-channels and e-channel touchpoints: Empirical studies of consumer behavior in the multichannel ecommerce environment. Journal of Business Research, 107, 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.048
  68. Wang, E., & Yu, J.-R. (2016). Effect of product attribute beliefs of ready-to-drink coffee beverages on consumer-perceived value and repurchase intention. British Food Journal, 118(12), 2963–2980. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-03-2016-0128
  69. Wittmann, M., & Paulus, M. P. (2008). Decision making, impulsivity, and time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.004
  70. Wu, X., & Liao, H. (2021). Modeling personalized cognition of customers in online shopping. Omega, 104, 102471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102471
  71. Xu, X., Li, Q., Peng, L., Hsia, T.-L., Huang, C.-J., & Wu, J.-H. (2017). The impact of informational incentives and social influence on consumer behavior during Alibaba's online shopping carnival. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.018
  72. Yan, Q., Wang, L., Chen, W., & Cho, J. (2016). Study on the influencing factors of unplanned consumption in a large online promotion activity. Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 453–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-016-9215-x
  73. Yin, J., & Qiu, X. (2021). AI technology and online purchase intention: Structural equation model based on perceived value. Sustainability, 13(10), 5671. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105671
  74. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
  75. Zemack-Rugar, Y., Rabino, R., Cavanaugh, L. A., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2016). When donating is liberating: The role of product and consumer characteristics in the appeal of cause-related products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(2), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.06.001
  76. Zheng, X., Liu, N., & Zhao, L. (2013). A study of the effectiveness of online scarce promotion — Based on the comparison of planned buying and unplanned buying (WHICEB 2013 Proceedings. 51). https://aisel.aisnet.org/whiceb2013/51
  77. Zirena-Bejarano, P. P., & Zirena, E. M. (2023). Mediating effect of subjective norms in the relationship between attitude and online purchase decision. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(7), 30–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i7/170032
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines