New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Relationship Between Humor in Advertising and Attitude Towards Ads : A Meta-Analysis

Simranjeet Kaur1Dheeraj Nim2Shamily Jaggi3

1 Assistant Professor (Management), Arya IMT, Phagwara, Punjab & Research Scholar at Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar - Delhi, Grand Trunk Rd, Phagwara - 144 001, Punjab

2 Professor and Head, Oriental School of Business Management and Commerce, Oriental University, Indore - 453 555, Madhya Pradesh

3 Associate Professor, Mittal School of Business, Lovely Professional University, Punjab (India), Jalandhar - Delhi, Grand Trunk Rd, Phagwara -144 001, Punjab

Volume 52
Issue 3
Pages 8–20
Year 2022
Received: May 15, 2021 Accepted: Jan. 27, 2022 Published: March 15, 2022
Abstract

Humor is anything that is funny or is intended to be funny. Humor is a fundamental social communication ingredient used profusely in advertising worldwide. Humor in advertisements makes it an excellent tool for companies and brands to lure people into liking their products. The purpose of this paper was to do a systematic review and conduct a meta-analysis of studies analyzing the relationship between humor in advertising and attitude towards the ads. We found 171 articles that mentioned humor in advertising ; 71 articles were found with studies on both humor and attitude towards the ads. After scrutiny and systematic review, only 13 studies were included in the final study. The random effect model was used for the effect size because the studies belonged to different populations. Baujat plot was used to detect the studies causing heterogeneity. It was found that there was a large amount of variance in studies included in the analysis.

Keywords Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Humor Humor In Advertising Attitude Towards Ad Marketing Advertising
How to Cite

Simranjeet Kaur, Dheeraj Nim, Shamily Jaggi (2022). Relationship Between Humor in Advertising and Attitude Towards Ads : A Meta-Analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i3/160366

References
  1. Alden, D. L., Hoyer, W. D., & Lee, C. (1993). Identifying global and culture-specific dimensions of humor in advertising: A multinational analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224299305700205
  2. Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000). The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673605
  3. Ang, L., & Eisend, M. (2018). Single versus multiple measurements of attitudes: A meta-analysis of advertising studies validates the single-item measure approach. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(2), 218 – 227. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.2501/JAR-2017-001
  4. Baujat, B., Mahé, C., Pignon, J. - P., & Hill, C. (2002). A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses : Application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials. Statistics in Medicine, 21(18), 2641–2652. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1221
  5. Brown, M. R., Bhadury, R. K., & Pope, N. K. (2010). The impact of comedic violence on viral advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 39(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367390104
  6. Campbell, M. C., & Keller, K. L. (2003). Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1086/376800
  7. Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224379002700408
  8. Chung, H., & Zhao, X. (2011). The effects of humor on ad processing: Mediating role of brand familiarity. Journal of Promotion Management, 17(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2011.553788
  9. Durai, F. A. (2005). Impact of effective advertisement on consumer attitude. Indian Journal of Marketing, 35(3), 11 – 14.
  10. Eisend, M. (2018). Explaining the use and effects of humor in advertising: An evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 526–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2017.1335074
  11. Flaherty, K., Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (2004). The impact of perceived humor, product type, and humor style in radio advertising. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505154
  12. Gelb, B. D., & Pickett, C. M. (1983). Attitude-toward-the-ad: Links to humor and to advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 12(2), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1983.10672838
  13. Gendron, M. (2017). From public relations to brand activation: Integrating today's communications tools to move business forward. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 36(3), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21775
  14. Gregory, G. D., Crawford, H. J., Lu, L., & Ngo, L. (2019). Does humour travel? Advertising practices and audience effects in the United States and People's Republic of China. International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1590068
  15. Grougiou, V., Balabanis, G., & Manika, D. (2020). Does humour influence perceptions of the ethicality of female-disparaging advertising? Journal of Business Ethics, 164(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4032-x
  16. Hameed, I., Siddiqui, J., Siraj, & Husain, J. (2016). Conceptualizing humor in advertising : The moderating role of self-monitoring. Pakistan Business Review, 18(3), 692–709.
  17. Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557 – 560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
  18. Hoffmann, S., Schwarz, U., Dalicho, L., & Hutter, K. (2014). Humor in cross-cultural advertising: A content analysis and test of effectiveness in German and Spanish print advertisements. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.022
  19. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's recent consequences: Using dimension scores in theory and research. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 1(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F147059580111002
  20. Hornik, J., Ofir, C., & Rachamim, M. (2016). Quantitative evaluation of persuasive appeals using comparative meta-analysis. The Communication Review, 19(3), 192–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2016.1195204
  21. Januz, L. R. (1977). Humor in advertising can be effective if used carefully and with good taste. Inland Printer/American Lithographer, 70.
  22. Kellaris, J. J., & Cline, T. W. (2007). Humor and ad memorability: On the contributions of humor expectancy, relevancy, and need for humor. Psychology & Marketing, 24(6), 497–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20170
  23. Khandeparkar, K., & Abhishek. (2017). Influence of media context on humorous advertising effectiveness. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2016-0082
  24. Kumar, S. (2019). Consumer preference towards private label brands with reference to retail apparel in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(7), 49–66. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i7/145404
  25. Madden, T. J., & Weinberger, M. G. (1984). Humor in advertising: A practitioner view. Journal of Advertising Research, 24(4), 23 – 29.
  26. Markiewicz, D. (1972). Effects of humor on persuasion. Sociometry, 407 – 422.
  27. Nandi, S., Bhat, S., & Wolfs, B. (2019). Effectiveness of Indian advertisements in breaking stereotypes : A comparative analysis using the hierarchy of effects model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i3/142143
  28. Padival, A., Michael, L. K., & Hebbar, S. (2019). Consumer perception towards social media advertisements: A study done in a semi-urban city of South India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i2/141582
  29. Pangriya, R., & Kumar, M. R. (2018). A study of consumers' attitude towards online private label brands using the tri-component model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(5), 7–20. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i5/123440
  30. Phillips, K. (1968). When a funny commercial is good, it's great! Broadcasting, 74(May 13), p. 26.
  31. Quintana, D. S. (2015). From pre-registration to publication: A non-technical primer for conducting a meta-analysis to synthesize correlational data. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1549. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01549
  32. Raina, D., & Khajuria, K. (2012). Effectiveness of advertisements in India: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 42(5), 30–38. http://indianjournalofmarketing.com/index.php/ijom/article/view/37523
  33. Sabri, O. (2012). Taboo advertising: Can humor help to attract attention and enhance recall? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(4), 407–422. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679200404
  34. Schwarz, U., Hoffmann, S., & Hutter, K. (2015). Do men and women laugh about different types of humor? A comparison of satire, sentimental comedy, and comic wit in print ads. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 36(1), 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2014.912599
  35. Siddhu, V. (2021). The role of humor appeal in advertising. International Journal of Trade & Commerce-Iiartc, 10(1), 107–117. http://doi.org/10.46333/ijtc/10/1/11
  36. Speck, P. S. (1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 13(1–2), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01633392.1991.10504957
  37. Spielmann, N. (2014). How funny was that? Uncovering humor mechanisms. European Journal of Marketing, 48(9/10), 1892–1910. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2012-0393
  38. Srivastava, R. K., & Dorsch, M. J. (2020). Understanding the viability of three types of approach of advertising in emerging markets. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(8), 799–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2019.1586749
  39. Stern, B. B. (1996). Advertising comedy in electronic drama: The construct, theory and taxonomy. European Journal of Marketing, 30(9), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610130034
  40. Sternthal, B., & Craig, C. S. (1973). Humor in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297303700403
  41. Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(1), 16–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291002
  42. Toncar, M. F. (2001). The use of humour in television advertising: Revisiting the US-UK comparison. International Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 521–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2001.11104909
  43. Verma, M., & Saranya, R. (2014). Role of gender in influencing consumers' attitude towards online advertising. Indian Journal of Marketing, 44(12), 32–46. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2014/v44/i12/80009
  44. Wang, Y., Lu, S., Liu, J., Tan, J., & Zhang, J. (2019). The influence of culture on attitudes towards humorous advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01015
  45. Warren, C., Carter, E. P., & McGraw, A. P. (2019). Being funny is not enough: The influence of perceived humor and negative emotional reactions on brand attitudes. International Journal of Advertising, 38(7), 1025–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1620090
  46. Woltman Elpers, J. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). Humor in television advertising: A moment-to-moment analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 592–598. https://doi.org/10.1086/425094
  47. Zhang, Y. (1996). Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1996.10673493
  48. Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Responses to humorous ads: Does audience involvement matter? Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350408
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines