Purpose: Transaction cost benefit is the prime reason for the adoption of technology by the bottom of the pyramid who survive on agriculture. This article empirically tested perceived economic well-being (PEWB) and conspicuous consumption (CC) for being the antecedents of transaction cost benefit as discerned by the bottom of the pyramid (BoP) section.

Methodology: Data were collected from 329 respondents by a two-stage stratified sampling procedure from rural Indian farmers using a structured survey instrument. In the first stage, the measurement model was examined for its reliability and validity, while in the second stage, the strength and direction of the hypothesized paths were investigated through the structural model. The relationships were subsequently checked for the moderation effects of income and gender.

Findings: This study affirmed that CC and PEWB established transaction cost benefits. Moreover, income and gender moderated the PEWB–CC relationship, resulting in important implications for the service providers.Practical

Implications: The BoP segment also wants to show off or consume conspicuously. If they are able to achieve it, they sense a benefit. Any perceived economic or non-economic benefit with the use of a product/service augurs cost benefit for this segment.

Originality: Through this research, the author identified the interplay of CC and PEWB, which leads to transaction cost benefits. It can be used as a measure to gauge the financial inclusion of bottom-of-the-pyramid farmers in developing countries.

1. Ahmed, G., & Kumar, M. (2015). BOP theory in an emerging market economy: India under the microscope. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 3(2), 12–22. https://research.skylineuniversity.ac.ae/id/eprint/379
2. Alaghehband, F. K., Rivard, S., Wu, S., & Goyette, S. (2011). An assessment of the use of transaction cost theory in information technology outsourcing. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.04.003
3. Anderson, J. L., Markides, C., & Kupp, M. (2010). The last frontier: Market creation in conflict zones, deep rural areas, and urban slums. California Management Review, 52(4), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.52.4.6
4. Anderson, J., & Markides, C. (2007). Strategic innovation at the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/strategic-innovation-at-the-base-of-the-pyramid/
5. Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the 'bottom of the pyramid': The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01042.x
6. Asian Development Bank. (2014). Innovative Asia: Advancing the knowledge-based economy: The next policy agenda. ADB. https://www.adb.org/publications/innovative-asia-advancing-knowledge-based-economy-next-policy-agenda
7. Barki, E., & Parente, J. (2006). Consumer Behaviour at the base of the pyramid market in Brazil. Greener Management International, 56, 11–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/greemanainte.56.11
8. Beckett, M., & Pebley, A. R. (2003). Ethnicity, language, and economic well-being in rural Guatemala. Rural Sociology, 68(3), 434–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00145.x
9. Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
10. Bharti, K., Sharma, V., Agrawal, R., & Sengar, A. (2014). Marketer's mindset: Key to develop bottom of the pyramid market. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.182
11. Bluhm, R., de Crombrugghe, D., & Szirmai, A. (2018). Poverty accounting. European Economic Review, 104, 237–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.03.003
12. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.
13. Cardoso, M. V. (2005). The international market of popular goods: A mapping of potential markets for Brazilian companies (Doctoral dissertation, University of São Paulo). Faculty of Economics, Administration and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.11606/D.12.2005.tde-16122022-114746
14. Carli, L. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00106
15. Carter, S. (2011). The rewards of entrepreneurship: Exploring the inomes wealth, and economic well-being of entrepreneurial households. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00422.x
16. Chakrabarti, R., & Henneberg, S. C. (2023). Base of the Pyramid entrepreneurship through silent design and effectuation. Journal of Business Research, 153, Article ID 113633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113633
17. Chakravarti, D. (2006). Voices unheard: The psychology of consumption in poverty and development. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_8
18. Chaudhuri, H. R., Mazumdar, S., & Ghosal, A. (2011). Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualisation, scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.364
19. Che, T., Peng, Z., Lim, K. H., & Hua, Z. (2015). Antecedents of consumers' intention to revisit an online group-buying website: A transaction cost perspective. Information & Management, 52(5), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.04.004
20. Cheah, J.-H., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Ramayah, T., & Ting, H. (2018). Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(11), 3192–3210. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2017-0649
21. Chen, C. C., Peng, M. W., & Saparito, P. A. (2002). Individualism, collectivism, and opportunism: A cultural perspective on transaction cost economics. Journal of Management, 28(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800405
22. Chircu, A. M., & Mahajan, V. (2006). Managing electronic commerce retail transaction costs for customer value. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.07.011
23. Christen, M., & Morgan, R. M. (2005). Keeping up with the Joneses: Analysing the effect of income inequality on consumer borrowing. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 3(2), 145–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11129-005-0351-1
24. CIA.gov. (2022). The world factbook. CIA. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/
25. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
26. Deb, S., & Sengupta, S. (2020). What makes the base of the pyramid susceptible to investment fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-03-2019-0035
27. Dey, B. L., Pandit, A., Saren, M., Bhowmick, S., & Woodruffe-Burton, H. (2016). Co-creation of value at the bottom of the pyramid: Analysing Bangladeshi farmers' use of mobile telephony. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.10.009
28. Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
29. Draughn, P. S., LeBoeuf, R. C., Wozniak, P. J., Lawrence, F. C., & Welch, L. R. (1994). Divorcees' economic well-being and financial adequacy as related to interfamily grants. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 22(1–2), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v22n01_03
30. Duffy, R. D., England, J. W., Douglass, R. P., Autin, K. L., & Allan, B. A. (2017). Perceiving a calling and well-being: Motivation and access to opportunity as moderators. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 98, 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.003
31. Fafchamps, M., & Shilpi, F. (2008). Subjective welfare, isolation, and relative consumption. Journal of Development Economics, 86(1), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.08.004
32. Fernández-Barcala, M., & González-Díaz, M. (2006). Brand equity in the European fruit and vegetable sector: A transaction cost approach. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.01.004
33. Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (eds.), Social exchanges: Advances in theory and research (pp. 77–94). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-3087-5_4
34. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1),39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
35. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794670
36. Ghosal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 13–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/258627
37. Gilbert, S., & Kelloway, E. K. (2014). Using single items to measure job stressors. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 7(3), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-03-2013-0011
38. Gordon, R. (2013). Unlocking the potential of upstream social marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 47(9), 1525–1547. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2011-0523
39. Gorodnichenko, Y., Peter, K. S., & Stolyarov, D. (2010). Inequality and volatility moderation in Russia: Evidence from micro-level panel data on consumption and income. Review of Economic Dynamics, 13(1), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2009.09.006
40. Goyal, S., Agrawal, A., & Sergi, B. S. (2021). Social entrepreneurship for scalable solutions addressing sustainable development goals (SDGs) at BoP in India. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(3/4), 509–529. https://doi.org/10.1108/QROM-07-2020-1992
41. Gronmo, S. (1988). Compensatory consumer behavior: Elements of a critical sociology of consumption. In P. Otnes (ed.), The sociology of consumption (pp. 65–85). Humanities Press.
42. Guesalaga, R., & Marshall, P. (2008). Purchasing power at the bottom of the pyramid: Differences across geographic regions and income tiers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(7), 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760810915626
43. Gupta, A., & Savita, U. (2024). Do eWOM and brand image drive purchase intention of online travel shoppers : A case study of Delhi - NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i3/173567
44. Gutiérrez, R., & Vernis, A. (2016). Innovations to serve low-income citizens: When corporations leave their comfort zones. Long Range Planning, 49(3), 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.12.007
45. Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
46. Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
47. Hayhoe, C. R., & Wilhelm, M. S. (1998). Modelling perceived economic well-being in a family setting: A gender perspective. Association for Financial Counseling and Planning Education, 9(1), 21–34. https://www.afcpe.org/news-and-publications/journal-of-financial-counseling-and-planning/volume-9-1/
48. Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00116
49. Hobman, E. V., Frederiks, E. R., Stenner, K., & Meikle, S. (2016). Uptake and usage of cost-reflective electricity pricing: Insights from psychology and behavioural economics. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 57, 455–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.144
50. Jaikumar, S., & Sarin, A. (2015). Conspicuous consumption and income inequality in an emerging economy: Evidence from India. Marketing Letters, 26, 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9350-5
51. Jaikumar, S., Singh, R., & Sarin, A. (2018). 'I show off, so I am well off': Subjective economic well-being and conspicuous consumption in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Research, 86, 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.05.027
52. Johnson, C. M., Tariq, A., & Baker, T. L. (2018). From Gucci to green bags: Conspicuous consumption as a signal for pro-social behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2018.1487769
53. Kamin, T., Kubacki, K., & Atanasova, S. (2022). Empowerment in social marketing: Systematic review and critical reflection. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(11–12), 1104–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2078864
54. Kaplinsky, R. (2011). 'Bottom of the pyramid innovation' and pro-poor growth. World Bank. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/26796
55. Karnani, A. (2007). The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review, 49(4), 90–111. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166407
56. Kennedy, A.-M., Kemper, J. A., & Parsons, A. G. (2018). Upstream social marketing strategy. Journal of Social Marketing, 8(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-03-2017-0016
57. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-03476-000
58. Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M., & Rufin, C. (2014). Reviewing a decade of research on the “base/bottom of the pyramid” (BOP) concept. Business & Society, 53(3), 338–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312474928
59. Kumbhar, V. (2013). Some critical issues of women entrepreneurship in rural India. Available at SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2043821
60. Lancellotti, M. P., & Thomas, S. (2018). Men hate it, women love it: Guilty pleasure advertising messages. Journal of Business Research, 85, 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.021
61. Lappeman, J., Ransome, K., & Louw, Z. (2019). Not one segment: Using global and local BoP characteristics to model country-specific consumer profiles. European Business Review, 31(3), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-01-2018-0027
62. Linssen, R., van Kempen, L., & Kraaykamp, G. (2011). Subjective well-being in Rural India: The curse of conspicuous consumption. Social Indicators Research, 101, 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9635-2
63. London, T., & Anupindi, R. (2011). Using the base-of-the-pyramid perspective to catalyze interdependence-based collaborations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(31), 12338–12343. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1013626108
64. Moav, O., & Neeman, Z. (2012). Saving rates and poverty: The role of conspicuous consumption and human capital. The Economic Journal, 122(563), 933–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2012.02516.x
65. Mokhlis, S. (2009). Relevancy and measurement of religiosity in consumer behavior research. International Business Research, 2(3), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v2n3p75
66. Mudliar, P. (2018). Public wifi is for men and mobile internet is for women: Interrogating politics of space and gender around WiFi hotspots. In Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 1–24). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274395
67. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430
68. Nagy, M., Bennett, D., & Graham, C. (2020). Why include the BOP in your international marketing strategy. International Marketing Review, 37(1), 76–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2019-0097
69. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. McGraw Hill.
70. O'Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.155
71. Ordabayeva, N., & Chandon, P. (2011). Getting ahead of the Joneses: When equality increases conspicuous consumption among bottom-tier consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1086/658165
72. Panda, D., Masani, S., & Dasgupta, T. (2022). Packaging-influenced-purchase decision segment the bottom of the pyramid consumer marketplace? Evidence from West Bengal, India. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.06.004
73. Prahalad, C. K. (2004, August 25). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Wharton School Publishing. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-fortune-at-the-bottom-of-the-pyramid-eradicating-poverty-through-profits/
74. Prahalad, C. K. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00874.x
75. Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy + Business, 26, 1–14. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/11518
76. Raffaelli, M., Tran, S. P., Wiley, A. R., Galarza-Heras, M., & Lazarevic, V. (2012). Risk and resilience in rural communities: The experiences of immigrant latina mothers. Family Relations, 61(4), 559–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2012.00717.x
77. Rahman, S. A., Amran, A., Ahmad, N. H., & Taghizadeh, S. K. (2014). GrameenPhone: Creating a win-win at the base of the pyramid in Bangladesh. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 33(5), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21562
78. Ramani, S. V., SadreGhazi, S., & Gupta, S. (2017). Catalysing innovation for social impact: The role of social enterprises in the Indian sanitation sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.015
79. Sabri, M. F., Cook, C. C., & Gudmunson, C. G. (2012). Financial well-being of Malaysian college students. Asian Education and Development Studies, 1(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1108/20463161211240124
80. Schuster, T., & Holtbrügge, D. (2012). Market entry of multinational companies in markets at the bottom of the pyramid: A learning perspective. International Business Review, 21(5), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.09.007
81. Segal, B., & Podoshen, J. S. (2013). An examination of materialism, conspicuous consumption and gender differences. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 37(2), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2012.01099.x
82. Senevirathne, H. M., Rajasinghe, N. A., & Perera, D. A. (2016). Conspicuous consumption and rural poverty in farming community: An empirical investigation based on two DS Divisions in Kurunegala district in Sri Lanka. Procedia Food Science, 6, 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2016.02.015
83. Singh, R., Agarwal, S., & Modi, P. (2015). Market separations for BOP producers: The case of market development for the Chanderi cluster weavers in India. International Journal of Rural Management, 11(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973005215599280
84. Stanković, F. (2008). Conspicuous consumption. In S. N. Durlauf, & L. E. Blume (eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (Vol. 2, pp. 118–119). Palgrave Macmillan.
85. Tabeck, P. S., & Singh, A. B. (2022). Acceptance of mobile apps among bottom of pyramid customers of urban areas. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(9), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i9/171984
86. Tadelis, S., & Williamson, O. E. (2013). Transaction cost economics. In R. Gibbons & J. Roberts (eds.), The handbook of organizational economics (pp. 159–190). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400845354-006
87. Truong, V. D. (2014). Social marketing: A systematic review of research 1998–2012. Social Marketing Quarterly, 20(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500413517666
88. Undurraga, E. A., Nica, V., Zhang, R., Mensah, I. C., & Godoy, R. A. (2016). Individual health and the visibility of village economic inequality: Longitudinal evidence from native Amazonians in Bolivia. Economics & Human Biology, 23, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ehb.2016.06.004
89. van Praag, B. M., Frijters, P., & Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A. (2003). The anatomy of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00140-3
90. Vaswani, L. K., Aithal, R., Pradhan, D., & Sridhar, G. (2005). Rural marketing in the development paradigm. International Journal of Rural Management, 1(2), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/097306800500100206
91. Veblen, T. (1992). The theory of the leisure class (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315135373
92. Walson, C. O., & Fitzsimmons, V. S. (1993). Financial manager's perception of rural household economie well-being: Development and testing of a composite measure. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 14(3), 193–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022177
93. Wang, M. W., & Stanley, J. C. (1970). Differential weighting: A review of methods and empirical studies. Review of Educational Research, 40(5), 663–705. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543040005663
94. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relation. The Journal of Law & Economics, 22(2), 233–261. http://www.jstor.org/stable/725118
95. Wu, L.-Y., Chen, K.-Y., Chen, P.-Y., & Cheng, S.-L. (2014). Perceived value, transaction cost, and repurchase-intention in online shopping: A relational exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2768–2776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.007