Purpose: The present study developed a conceptual model for the antecedents of status consumption for fashion brands in India. It also decoded how increased consumer focus toward sustainability has impacted the consumption of fashion brands.

Methodology: Six consumption values and traits (i.e., the need for materialism, uniqueness, self-esteem, public self-consciousness, social norms, and social media influence) were identified as critical factors based on a narrative literature review (NLR) of the status and sustainable consumption habits.

Findings: We discovered unmistakable indicators that the luxury market is shifting toward a more sustainable paradigm. By choosing sustainable and organic options, consumers are showing fashion manufacturers more consideration. A shift in consumer values and characteristics (i.e., demand for materialism, uniqueness, self-esteem, public self-consciousness, social norms, and social media influence) is linked to a growing preference for sustainable fashion labels.Practical

Implications: It was recommended that marketers address this paradigm shift in consumer values and traits by using sustainability as a key differentiator for luxury brands. Mindfulness may erode materialistic values so that brands may focus on “conscientious value” instead of “conspicuous value.” Our study is not free from limitations and allows scope for future researchers to test the conceptual model empirically.

Originality: This study is an early attempt to evaluate the effects of sustainability concerns on post-COVID fashion brand consumption and the potential contributing elements.

1. Accenture.com. (2020, May 04). COVID-19 increasing consumers' focus on “Ethical consumption,” Accenture survey finds [Newsroom]. https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/covid-19-increasing-consumers-focus-on-ethical-consumption-accenture-survey-finds.htm
2. Ali, Q., Parveen, S., Yaacob, H., Zaini, Z., & Sarbini, N. A. (2021). COVID-19 and dynamics of environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility in Malaysia. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 28, 56199–56218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14612-z
3. Amed, I., Berg, A., Balchandani, A., Hedrich, S., Rölkens, F., Young, R., Jensen, J., & Peng, A. (2020). The state of fashion 2021. The Business of Fashion and McKinsey & Company. https://www.businessoffashion.com/reports/news-analysis/download-the-report-the-state-of-fashion-2021
4. Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self-presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 547–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb02384.x
5. Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/208911
6. Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1086/209186
7. Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/209154
8. Berg, A., Hedrich, S., Ibáñez, P., Kappelmark, S., & Magnus, K.-M. (2019). Fashion's new must-have: Sustainable sourcing at scale. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/retail/our-insights/fashions-new-must-have-sustainable-sourcing-at-scale
9. Berger, J. (2017). Are luxury brand labels and “green” labels costly signals of social status? An extended replication. PLoS ONE, 12(2), e0170216. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170216
10. Bhansali, P. (2020). The ultimate guide to sustainable fashion in India. The Shooting Star. https://the-shooting-star.com/sustainable-fashion-india-guide/
11. Biondi, A. (2020, February 21). Coronavirus could cause a €40 billion decline in luxury sales in 2020. VOGUE Business. https://www.voguebusiness.com/companies/coronavirus-luxury-brands-impact-sales-altagamma
12. Brown, J. D. (1993). Self-esteem and self-evaluation: Feeling is believing. In J. M. Suls (ed.), The self in social perspective (pp. 27–58). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Can, L. (2017). Perceived herd behavior and purchase intention in Instagram as social media marketing channel. Uluslararası Hakemli Akademik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 59, 208–220.
14. Capgemini.com. (2020, July). Research: How sustainability is changing consumer preferences [Press release]. https://www.capgemini.com/in-en/news/press-releases/research-how-sustainability-is-changing-consumer-preferences/
15. Chaudhuri, H. R., Mazumdar, S., & Ghoshal, A. (2011). Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualisation, scale development & validation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 10(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.364
16. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance & conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015
17. Ciasullo, M. V., Maione, G., Torre, C., & Troisi, O. (2017). What about sustainability? An empirical analysis of consumers' purchasing behavior in fashion context. Sustainability, 9(9), 1617. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091617
18. Crocker, J., & Nuer, N. (2003). The insatiable quest for self-worth. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 31–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449035
19. Desai, S. (2020, August 28). How the coronavirus is changing consumption patterns. Mint. https://www.livemint.com/industry/retail/how-the-coronavirus-is-changing-consumption-patterns-11598582170732.html
20. DuBois, D. L., & Flay, B. R. (2004). The healthy pursuit of self-esteem: Comment on and alternative to the Crocker and Park (2004) formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 130(3), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.415
21. Fenigstein, A., Scheier, M. F., & Buss, A. H. (1975). Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43(4), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076760
22. Fifita, I. M., Seo, Y., Ko, E., Conroy, D., & Hong, D. (2020). Fashioning organics: Wellbeing, sustainability & status consumption practices. Journal of Business Research, 117, 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.005
23. Fu, W., & Liang, B. C. (2019). How millennials' personality traits influence their eco-fashion purchase behavior. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 5(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.5-3-2
24. Geiger, S. M., Grossman, P., & Schrader, U. (2019). Mindfulness and sustainability: Correlation or causation? Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.010
25. Giri, A., Biswas, W., & Salo, J. (2022). 'Buy luxury': Adapting the shift framework to explore the psychological facets enabling consumers for sustainable luxury consumption. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(6), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i6/169836
26. GlobalWebIndex.com. (2019). Social: GlobalWeb Index's flagship report on the latest trends in social media - Flagship report 2019. https://www.gwi.com/hubfs/Social%20Report.pdf
27. Goldsmith, R. E., Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, E. B., & Kim, W.-M. (2013). Fashion innovativeness and materialism. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 4(4), 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/20932685.2013.817142
28. Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017346
29. Guarín, A., & Knorringa, P. (2013). 'New' middle-class consumers in rising powers: Responsible consumption and private standards. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2198971
30. Hammad, H., Muster, V., El-Bassiouny, N. M., & Schaefer, M. (2019). Status and sustainability: Can conspicuous motives foster sustainable consumption in newly industrialized countries? Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 23(4), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-06-2019-0115
31. Han, Y. J., Nunes, J. C., & Drèze, X. (2010). Signaling status with luxury goods: The role of brand prominence. Journal of Marketing, 74(4), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.4.015
32. Heydari, A., & Laroche, M. (2020). Social media usage, status consumption, and online public consumption: An abstract. In, S. Wu, F. Pantoja, & N. Krey (eds.), Marketing opportunities and challenges in a changing global marketplace. AMSAC 2019. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39165-2_266
33. Hudders, L., & Pandelaere, M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(3), 411–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9271-9
34. Kaufmann, H. R., Petrovici, D. A., Filho, C. G., & Ayres, A. (2016). Identifying moderators of brand attachment for driving customer purchase intention of original vs. counterfeits of luxury brands. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5735–5747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.05.003
35. Khare, A., Parveen, C., & Mishra, A. (2012). Influence of normative and informative values on fashion clothing involvement of Indian women. Journal of Customer Behaviour, 11(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539212X13286273975193
36. Kim, H., Lee, E.-J., & Hur, W.-M. (2012). The normative social influence on eco-friendly consumer behavior: The moderating effect of environmental marketing claims. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 30(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X12440875
37. Knight, D. K., & Young Kim, E. (2007). Japanese consumers' need for uniqueness: Effects on brand perceptions and purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 11(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020710751428
38. Knowles, J., Ettenson, R., Lynch, P., & Dollens, J. (2020, May 5). Growth opportunities for brands during the COVID-19 crisis. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/growth-opportunities-for-brands-during-the-COVID-19-crisis/
39. Kokkoris, M. D., & Kühnen, U. (2013). More than just an opinion: The effect of verbal self-expression on consumer choice. Psychology & Marketing, 30(12), 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20667
40. Kutsenkova, Z. (2017). The sustainable future of the modern fashion industry [Honors Theses, Dominican University of California]. https://doi.org/10.33015/dominican.edu/2017.HONORS.ST.02
41. Legere, A. (2017). A model for consumer psychology and behaviour towards slow fashion: From self-concept theory perspective [Unpublished Thesis]. Texas State University.
42. Leonard, N. H., Beauvais, L. L., & Scholl, R. W. (1995). A self concept - based model of work motivation. In, Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536607
43. Loureiro, S. M., Maximiano, M., & Panchapakesan, P. (2018). Engaging fashion consumers in social media: The case of luxury brands. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(3), 310–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2018.1431810
44. McNeill, L., & Venter, B. (2019). Identity, self-concept and young women's engagement with collaborative sustainable fashion consumption model. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43(4), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12516
45. Muret, D. (2020, October 26). Luxury goods consumption redefined by Covid-19. Fashion Network. https://ww.fashionnetwork.com/news/Luxury-goods-consumption-redefined-by-covid-19,1254378.html
46. Netemeyer, R. G., Burton, S., & Lichtenstein, D. R. (1995). Trait aspects of vanity: Measurement and relevance to consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 612–626. https://doi.org/10.1086/209422
47. Nezlek, J. B., & Leary, M. R. (2002). Individual differences in self-presentational motives in daily social interaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282007
48. Okur, N., Saricam, C., Iri, A. R., & Sari, I. (2023). Analyzing the impact of Covid-19 on sustainable fashion consumption with a model based on consumer value perceptions. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 27(5), 826–850. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-10-2021-0272
49. Pasricha, D., Jain, K., & Singh, G. (2020). Antecedents affecting the purchase intention of millennials towards luxury fashion goods: A mixed methods study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i1/149772
50. Piron, F. (2000). Consumers' perceptions of the country-of-origin effect on purchasing intentions of (in)conspicuous products. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(4), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760010335330
51. Podoshen, J. S., & Andrzejewski, S. A. (2012). An examination of the relationships between materialism, conspicuous consumption, impulse buying, and brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679200306
52. Policarpo, M. C., & Aguiar, E. C. (2019). How self-expressive benefits relate to buying a hybrid car as a green product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, 119859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119859
53. Reiter, L., & Kozar, J. (2016). Chinese students' knowledge of environmentally and socially sustainable apparel and sustainable purchase intentions. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 8(3), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v8n3p12
54. Richins, M. L. (1994a). Special possessions and the expression of material values. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1086/209415
55. Richins, M. L. (1994b). Valuing things: The public and private meanings of possessions. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1086/209414
56. Richins, M. L. (1999). Possessions, materialism and other-directedness in the expression of self. In M. B. Holbrook (ed.), Consumer value: A framework for analysis and research (pp. 105–125). Routledge.
57. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1990). Measuring material values: A preliminary report of scale development. In, M. E. Goldberg, G. Gorn, & R. W. Pollay (eds.), NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 17, pp. 169 – 175). Association for Consumer Research.
58. Richins, M. L., & Dawson, S. (1992). A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1086/209304
59. Roberts-Islam, B. (2020, April 21). Social sustainability, overstock and 'greenwashing': How COVID-19 is changing the fashion industry? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brookerobertsislam/2020/04/21/social-sustainability overstock-and-greenwashing-how-covid-19-is-changing-the-fashion-industry/?sh=b0f72cf582d3
60. Roux, F., Tafani, E., & Vigneron, F. (2017). Values associated with luxury brand consumption and the role of gender. Journal of Business Research, 71, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.012
61. Saptono, L., Soetjipto, B. E., Wahjoedi, & Wahyono, H. (2019). The influence of financial quantitative literacy and subjective numeracy on impulsive consumption with materialism as the mediator variable. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(10), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i10/147563
62. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985). The self-consciousness scale: A revised version for use with general populations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15(8), 687–699. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02268.x
63. Sen, S., & Nayak, S. (2019). Influence of materialism on impulse buying among Indian millennials: Does income matter? Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(12), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i12/149110
64. Severo, E. A., De Guimarães, J. C., & Dellarmelin, M. L. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on environmental awareness, sustainable consumption and social responsibility: Evidence from generations in Brazil and Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 286, 124947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124947
65. Shaban, Y., & El-Bassiouny, N. (2017). The many facets of sustainable consumption, anti-consumption, and emotional brand attachment in Egypt. African Journal of Business and Economics Research, 12(1), 163–204. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-70288c938
66. Shrum, L. J., Lowrey, T. M., Pandelaere, M., Ruvio, A. A., Gentina, E., Furchheim, P., Herbert, M., Hudders, L., Lens, I., Mandel, N., Nairn, A., Samper, A., Soscia, I., & Steinfield, L. (2014). Materialism: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Marketing Management, 30, 17–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2014.959985
67. Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86(5), 518–527. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-843X.86.5.518
68. Statista.com. (2022, October). Market insights: Apparel-India [market insights]. https://www.statista.com/outlook/cmo/apparel/india#revenue
69. Sukhdev, S., & Shallu, S. (2013). Compensatory consumption. Adv. Manag., 6, 62–70.
70. Thoumrungroje, A. (2014). The influence of social media intensity and EWOM on conspicuous consumption. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.009
71. Tian, K. T., & McKenzie, K. (2001). The long-term predictive validity of the consumers' need for uniqueness scale. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1003_5
72. Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1986.tb00732.x
73. Ünal, S., Deniz, E., & Akın, N. (2019). Determining the factors that influence the intention to purchase luxury fashion brands of young consumers. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 19(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.21121/EAB.511806
74. Vanauken, K. (2015). Using social media to improve customer engagement and promote products and services. Journal of Airport Management, 9(2), 109–117.
75. Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11, 484–506. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.bm.2540194
76. Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion theory. Erlbaum.
77. Wong, N. Y. (1997). Suppose you own the world and no one knows? Conspicuous consumption, materialism and self. In, M. Brucks & D. J. MacInnis (eds.), NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 24, pp. 197–203). Association for Consumer Research.
78. Workman, J. E., & Seung-Hee, L. (2017). What do we know about fashion adoption groups? A proposal and test of a model of fashion adoption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 41, 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12314
79. Yeniaras, V., & Akkemik, K. A. (2017). Materialism and fashion consciousness: The moderating role of status consumption tendencies & religiosity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(3), 498–513.
80. Zalando.com. (2020a, Oct 6). Zalando expects double-digit growth in 2020. https://corporate.zalando.com/en/financials/zalando-expects-double-digit-growth-2020
81. Zalando.com. (2020b, May 11). Zalando sees increased sustainable fashion sales. https://www.ecotextile.com/2020051126068/fashion-retail-news/zalando-sees-increased-sustainable-fashion-sales.html