New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Do eWOM and Brand Image Drive Purchase Intention of Online Travel Shoppers : A Case Study of Delhi - NCR

Ashwerya Gupta1Ubba Savita2

1 Research Scholar, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar - 125 001, Haryana

2 Professor, Haryana School of Business, Guru Jambheshwar University of Science & Technology, Hisar -125 001, Haryana

Volume 54
Issue 3
Pages 44–60
Year 2024
Received: March 5, 2023 Accepted: Oct. 25, 2023 Published: March 1, 2024
Abstract

Purpose: The increasing trend of traveling and the widespread use of the internet have led to a growth in the market for online travel buying. The present study yielded valuable insights into the impact of electronic word of mouth (eWOM) features, both directly and indirectly, on purchase intention for online travel items through brand image. Additionally, the association between eWOM traits and purchase intention is examined, as well as the mediating effect of brand image.

Methodology: A systematic survey was created and distributed to 854 internet-savvy participants who frequently purchase vacations online. The PLS-SEM software 3.3.3 was used to carry out the statistical analysis. Additionally, importance-performance matrix analysis, or IPMA, was used to investigate the critical elements involved in determining customer intention.

Findings: The study found that eWOM characteristics influence brand perception more so than consumers’ intentions to purchase online travel products. It was also demonstrated that eWOM characteristics were higher even if performance was less relevant. That being said, brand image was not as crucial as performance.Practical

Implications: Marketers and decision-makers in the online travel sector should take note of the study’s conclusions since they can significantly improve a brand’s reputation. The results could be used to monitor sentiments and gauge their impact.

Originality: The study emphasized the significance of eWOM attributes and brand image for purchase intentions in the context of the developing Indian online travel market. The study used the IPMA, a contemporary PLS-SEM technique, to establish the results.

Keywords Brand Image eWOM IPMA Online Travel Shopping Purchase Intention
How to Cite

Ashwerya Gupta, Ubba Savita (2024). Do eWOM and Brand Image Drive Purchase Intention of Online Travel Shoppers : A Case Study of Delhi - NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 44–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2024/v54/i3/173567

References
  1. Abubakar, A. M., Ilkan, M., & Sahin, P. (2016). eWOM, eReferral and gender in the virtual community. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(5), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2015-0090
  2. Alrwashdeh, M., Emeagwali, O. L., & Aljuhmani, H. Y. (2019). The effect of electronic word of mouth communication on purchase intention and brand image: An applicant smartphone brands in North Cyprus. Management Science Letters, 9, 505–518. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.011
  3. Bataineh, A. Q. (2015). The impact of perceived e-WOM on purchase intention: The mediating role of corporate image. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(1), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v7n1p126
  4. Bhāle, S., & Tongare, K. (2018). A conceptual model of helpfulness of online reviews in a blink. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(2), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i2/121331
  5. Bhattacharjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood mode. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805–825. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148755
  6. Brightlocal. (2020). Local consumer review survey 2020. https://www.brightlocal.com/research/local-consumer-review-survey/
  7. Cheung, C. M., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
  8. Cheung, C. M., Lee, M. K., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290
  9. Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
  10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  11. Diamantopoulos, A. (2008). Formative indicators: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Business Research, 61(12), 1201–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.01.008
  12. Farzin, M., & Fattahi, M. (2018). eWOM through social networking sites and impact on purchase intention and brand image in Iran. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 15(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2017-0062
  13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  14. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effects model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  15. Hair Jr., J. F., Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.069
  16. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  17. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665
  18. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40, 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  19. Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  20. Henseler, J. (2017). Bridging design and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Advertising, 46(1), 178–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780
  21. Henseler, J., Müller, T., & Schuberth, F. (2018). New guidelines for the use of PLS path modeling in hospitality, travel, and tourism research. In, F. Ali, S. M. Rasoolimanesh, & C. Cobanoglu (eds.), Applying partial least squares in tourism and hospitality research (pp. 17–33). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78756-699-620181002
  22. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  23. Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  24. Khalisa, N., & Kesuma, T. M. (2018). The impact of electronic word of mouth Instagram as recommendations halal culinary tours in Banda Aceh. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(5), 1028–1046. https://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i5/4481
  25. Khammash, M., & Griffiths, G. H. (2011). 'Arrivederci CIAO.com, Buongiorno Bing.com'— Electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM), antecedences and consequences. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.10.005
  26. King, R. A., Racherla, P., & Bush, V. D. (2014). What we know and don't know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(3), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2014.02.001
  27. Lien, C.-H., Wen, M.-J., Huang, L.-C., & Wu, K.-L. (2015). Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust and value on purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(4), 210–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2015.03.005
  28. Luo, C., Luo, X., Schatzberg, L., & Sia, C. L. (2013). Impact of informational factors on online recommendation credibility: The moderating role of source credibility. Decision Support Systems, 56, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.005
  29. Maduretno, R. B., & Junaedi, S. (2021). The importance of eWOM elements on online repurchase intention: Roles of trust and perceived usefulness. Jurnal Ekonomi Indonesia, 10(1), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.52813/jei.v10i1.59
  30. Mahadevan, K., & Joshi, S. (2021). Trends in electronic word of mouth research : A bibliometric review and analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(4), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i4/158468
  31. Martilla, J. A., & James, J. C. (1977). Importance-performance analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  32. Matute, J., Polo-Redondo, Y., & Utrillo, A. (2016). The influence of EWOM characteristics on online repurchases intention: Mediating roles of trust and perceived usefulness. Online Information Review, 40(7), 1090–1110. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-11-2015-0373
  33. Müller, T., Schuberth, F., & Henseler, J. (2018). PLS path modeling – A confirmatory approach to study tourism technology and tourist behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(3), 249– 266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-09-2017-0106
  34. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2005.11045823
  35. Park, D.-H., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2007.11.004
  36. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  37. Prasad, S., & Sen, S. (2018). Role of conviction in the impact of electronic word of mouth on purchase intention for financial products and services. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i1/120735
  38. Prasad, S., Gupta, I. C., & Totala, N. K. (2017). Social media usage, electronic word of mouth and purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-06-2016-0063
  39. Rao, K. S., & Rao, B. (2019). Examining eWOM credibility - Consumer purchase intention relationship in Facebook: A mediation analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(8), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i8/146169
  40. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., & Ali, F. (2018). Guest editorial. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, 9(3), 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTT-10-2018-142
  41. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Jaafar, M., Kock, N., & Ahmad, A. G. (2017). The effects of community factors on residents' perceptions toward world heritage site inscription and sustainable tourism development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(2), 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2016.1195836
  42. Richter, N. F., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). European management research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Management Journal, 34(6), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.08.001
  43. Rigdon, E. E. (2016). Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. European Management Journal, 34(6),598–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006
  44. Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-10-2015-0449
  45. Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 3998–4010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
  46. Seo, E.-J., & Park, J.-W. (2018). A study on the influence of the information characteristics of airline social media on e-WOM, brand equity and trust. The Open Transportation Journal, 12, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801812010289
  47. Shankar, R. S. (2020). Impact of cognitive and affective image on tourists' travel motivation. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(5–7), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i5-7/152118
  48. Sharma, A. K., & Sharma, R. (2022). Identification of the customers' preferred attributes while selecting an OTA (online travel agency) platform. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(7), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i7/170538
  49. Shin, J. I., Chung, K. H., Oh, J. S., & Lee, C. W. (2013). The effect of site quality on repurchase intention in Internet shopping through mediating variables: The case of university students in South Korea. International Journal of Information Management, 33(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.02.003
  50. Shiva, A., Narula, S., & Shahi, S. K. (2020). What drives retail investors' investment decisions? Evidence from no mobile phone phobia (Nomophobia) and investor fear of missing out (I - FOMO). Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 11(6), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.06.20/02
  51. Srivastava, M., & Fernandes, S. (2022). Can Indian millennials be engaged through online customer gamified experience? Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(6), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i6/169834
  52. Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society : Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
  53. Tanwar, A. S., Chaudhry, H., & Srivastava, M. K. (2021). Influencer marketing as a tool of digital consumer engagement : A systematic literature review. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(10), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i10/166439
  54. Teng, S., Wei Khong, K., Wei Goh, W., & Yee Loong Chong, A. (2014). Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media. Online Information Review, 38(6), 746–768. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2014-0089
  55. Thakur, C. K., Vijay, T. S., & Chatterjee, T. K. (2022). A study on travelers' motivation to provide online reviews. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 8–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i2/164156
  56. Tomar, V. S., Tomar, R. S., & Khatri, V. (2020). Moderating role of brand trust on offline vs. online shoppers and its impact on cognitive dissonance. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50 (8–9), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i8-9/154692
  57. van Riel, A. C., Henseler, J., Kemény, I., & Sasovova, Z. (2017). Estimating hierarchical constructs using consistent partial least squares: The case of second-order composites of common factors. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 459–477. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2016-0286
  58. Yeap, J. A., Ignatius, J., & Ramayah, T. (2014). Determining consumers' most preferred eWOM platform for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.034
  59. Zangeneh, S. K., Mohammadkazemi, R., & Rezvani, M. (2014). Investigating the effect of electronic word of mouth on customer's purchase intention of digital products. Management Science Letters, 4, 2433–2440. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2014.10.003
  60. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines