New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Application of RIDIT Analysis in Prioritizing Perceived Service Quality Dimensions of Management Graduates in Indian Universities

Vivek Kumar Pathak1Ashim Kumar Das2Rajeev Kumar Panda3

1 Research Scholar, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Silchar, NIT Road, Dist. Cachar, Silchar - 788 010, Assam

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Silchar, NIT Road, Dist. Cachar, Silchar - 788 010, Assam

3 Assistant Professor, School of Management, National Institute of Technology (NIT) Rourkela, Sector - 2, Rourkela - 769 008, Odisha

Volume 48
Issue 2
Pages 23–35
Year 2018
Received: Sept. 2, 2017 Accepted: Jan. 4, 2018 Published: Feb. 1, 2018
Abstract

The transformations in the present socioeconomic situation have compelled the management education in the higher-education sector to behave as a business entity. They are required to focus more on delivering superior quality of educational services to the students. The universities are forced to recognize and give emphasis to the factors which are influencing students' satisfaction and their future behavioural intentions. Based on these prevailing facts, the present study tried to explore the various dimensions of service quality as perceived by the management graduates of public universities. Further, the study attempted to prioritize the dimensions along with their items to draw meaningful conclusions for the management education sector. The study analyzed survey responses of 401 management graduates using factor analysis in order to diagnose the underlying relationships between the questionnaire items. These resulted in formation of related groups by the items and were named according to their collective characteristics. The study also employed the RIDIT analysis methodology independently to establish the relative importance of each item to the management graduates who participated in the survey. Based on the RIDIT analysis results, a priority ranking was allotted to each individual item. An analysis interpretation was then carried out to find out the extent to which the items grouped into each particular factor tended to have low or high priority rankings. The results of the study may be obliging to the university managers, particularly in a management education setting, to focus their strategies and plan their efforts in line with the findings to gain superior students'/graduates' satisfaction and favourable future behavioural intentions.

Keywords Perceived Service Quality Management Education Higher Education RIDIT Analysis India
How to Cite

Vivek Kumar Pathak, Ashim Kumar Das, Rajeev Kumar Panda (2018). Application of RIDIT Analysis in Prioritizing Perceived Service Quality Dimensions of Management Graduates in Indian Universities. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(2), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i2/121332

References
  1. Abdullah, F. (2006). The development of HEdPERF: A new measuring instrument of service quality for the higher education sector. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30 (6), 569-581. <a href=10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x target="_blank">10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00480.x</a>
  2. Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2012). Development of HiEdQUAL for measuring service quality in Indian higher education sector. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 412-416. Retrieved from <a href=http://ijimt.org/papers/265-CM243.pdf target="_blank">http://ijimt.org/papers/265-CM243.pdf</a>
  3. Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. J., & Swan, J. E. (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: A critical review of service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 10 (6), 62-81. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876049610148602 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876049610148602</a>
  4. Becket, N., & Brookes, M. (2006). Evaluating quality management in university departments. Quality Assurance in Education, 14 (2), 123-142. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880610662015 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880610662015</a>
  5. Beder, J. H., & Heim, R. C. (1990). On the use of ridit analysis. Psychometrika, 55(4), 603-616. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294610 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02294610</a>
  6. Bhardwaj, S. S. (2015). Service quality in Indian higher education: A comparative study of selected state owned and private universities. Indian Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 32-42. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2015/v45/i4/79958 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2015/v45/i4/79958</a>
  7. Bross, I. D. (1958). How to use ridit analysis. Biometrics, 14 (1), 18-38. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2527727 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2527727</a>
  8. Choudhury, K. (2015). Evaluating customer-perceived service quality in business management education in India: A study in topsis modeling. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(2), 208-225. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2014-0065 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2014-006</a>
  9. Clemes, M. D., Ozanne, L. K., & Tram, L. (2001). An examination of students' perceptions of service quality in higher education. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10 (3), 1-20. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2014-0065 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-04-2014-0065</a>
  10. Clemes, M., Cohen, A. D., & Wang, Y. (2013). Understanding Chinese university students' experiences: An empirical analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 25 (3), 391-427. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1108/APJML-07-2012-0068 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/APJML-07-2012-0068</a>
  11. DeShields Jr, O. W., Kara, A., & Kaynak, E. (2005). Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg's two-factor theory. International Journal of Educational Management, 19 (2), 128-139. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1108/09513540510582426 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540510582426</a>
  12. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London : Sage Publications.
  13. Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2013). Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987). Defensive marketing strategy by customer complaint management: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (4), 337-346. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.2307/3151381 target="_blank">10.2307/3151381</a>
  15. Gorsuch, R. L. (1990). Common factor analysis versus component analysis: Some well and little known facts. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25 (1), 33-39. <a href=10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_3 target="_blank">10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_3</a>
  16. Gupta, M. (2016). Students' perception of higher education service quality: An empirical study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46 (3), 54-67. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i3/88998 target="_blank">10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i3/88998</a>
  17. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. India: Pearson.
  18. Jagadeesh, R. (2000). Assuring quality in management education: The Indian context. Quality Assurance in Education, 8(3), 110-119. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1108/09684880010372707 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684880010372707</a>
  19. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39 (1), 31-36.
  20. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York : Guilford.
  21. Kumar, R. V., & Bhattacharyya, S. (2017). Modeling consumer opinion using RIDIT and grey relational analysis. In, Handbook of research on intelligent techniques and modeling applications in marketing analytics (pp. 185-201). IGI Global. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.4018/978-1-5225-0997-4 target="_blank">10.4018/978-1-5225-0997-4</a>
  22. Ladhari, R. (2009). A review of twenty years of SERVQUAL research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(2), 172-198. <a href= 10.1108/17566690910971445 target="_blank"> 10.1108/17566690910971445</a>
  23. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4 (1), 84-99. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84 target="_blank">10.1037/1082-989X.4.1.84</a>
  24. Mahajan, R., Agrawal, R., Sharma, V., & Nangia, V. (2014). Factors affecting quality of management education in India: An interpretive structural modelling approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 28 (4), 379-399. <a href=10.1108/IJEM-10-2012-0115 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2012-0115</a>
  25. Mahajan, R., Agrawal, R., Sharma, V., & Nangia, V. (2016). Analysis of challenges for management education in India using total interpretive structural modelling. Quality Assurance in Education, 24 (1), 95-122. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1108/QAE-07-2013-0030 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/QAE-07-2013-0030</a>
  26. Malhotra, N. K., Ulgado, F. M., Agarwal, J., Shainesh, G., & Wu, L. (2005). Dimensions of service quality in developed and developing economies: Multi-country cross-cultural comparisons. International Marketing Review, 22 (3), 256-278. <a href=10.1108/02651330510602204 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02651330510602204</a>
  27. Mattila, A. S. (1999). The role of culture in the service evaluation process. Journal of Service Research, 1 (3), 250-261. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/110.1177/109467059913006 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109467059913006</a>
  28. Narang, R. (2012). How do management students perceive the quality of education in public institutions? Quality Assurance in Education, 20 (4), 357-371. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881211263993 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881211263993</a>
  29. Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33 (3), 301-314. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602930701293231</a>
  30. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychological theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  31. Panda, R. K., & Kondasani, R. K. R. (2017). Customers' precedence for service quality dimensions in Indian private healthcare setting: A Ridit approach. Hospital Topics, 95(4), 90-99. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2017.1345571 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00185868.2017.1345571</a>
  32. Panda, R. K., & Sreekumar. (2012). Prioritizing issues in agribusiness using Ridit analysis: An Indian perspective. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 8(1), 80-88.
  33. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. The Journal of Marketing, 49 (4), 41-50. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251430 target="_blank">10.2307/1251430</a>
  34. Phadke, S. K. (2011). Consequences of service quality linkage-An insight from an empirical investigation in higher education. Indian Journal of Marketing, 41 (8), 11-19.
  35. Pradhan, B. K. (2009). Service quality indicators in education setting: Application of RIDIT method to likert scale surveys (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from <a href=http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/1518/1/PDF.pdf target="_blank">http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/1518/1/PDF.pdf</a>
  36. Sahney, S. (2011a). Delighting customers of management education in India: A student perspective, Part I. The TQM Journal, 23(6), 644-658. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542731111157635 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542731111157635</a>
  37. Sahney, S. (2011b). Delighting customers of management education in India: A student perspective, Part II. The TQM Journal, 23 (5), 531-548. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542731111157635 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17542731111157635</a>
  38. Schall, M. (2003). Best practices in the assessment of hotel-guest attitudes. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 44 (2), 51-65. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8804(03)90018-8 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0010-8804(03)90018-8</a>
  39. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill building approach. New Delhi : John Wiley & Sons.
  40. Sheehan, K. B. (2001). E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6 (2). <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00117.x</a>
  41. Sohail, M. S., & Shaikh, N. M. (2004). Quest for excellence in business education: A study of student impressions of service quality. International Journal of Educational Management, 18 (1), 58-65. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540410512163 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513540410512163</a>
  42. Sultan, P., & Wong, H. (2010). Performance-based service quality model: An empirical study on Japanese universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 18 (2), 126-143. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881011035349 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881011035349</a>
  43. Temtime, Z. T., & Mmereki, R. N. (2011). Challenges faced by graduate business education in Southern Africa: Perceptions of MBA participants. Quality Assurance in Education, 19 (2), 110-129. <a href=http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881111125023 target=-"_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09684881111125023</a>
  44. Uwawunkonye, E. G., & Anaene, O. I. C. (2013). A comparative study between ridit and modified ridit analysis. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 2(6), 248-254. <a href=10.11648/j.ajtas.20130206.23 target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20130206.23</a>
  45. Vaus, D. D. (2002). Surveys in social research. New South Wales: Allen and Unwin.
  46. Yusof, A. R. M., Hassan, Z. F., Rahman, S. A., & Ghouri, A. M. (2012). Educational service quality at public higher educational institutions: A proposed framework and importance of the sub-dimensions. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies, 1 (2), 36-49.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines