New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Associating Designed Information and Novelty with Purchase Intentions for Product Displays in Fashion Apparel Stores

Shweta Saini1Sanjeev Bansal2

1 Ph.D. Scholar , Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector 125, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh & Senior Consultant, Footwear Design and Development Institute, A-10/A, Sector 24, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh

2 Dean & Director, Amity Business School, Amity University, Sector 125, Noida - 201 301, Uttar Pradesh

Volume 53
Issue 12
Pages 8–26
Year 2023
Received: Sept. 30, 2022 Accepted: July 20, 2023 Published: Dec. 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose: This paper aimed to synthesize designed information, novelty, perceived usefulness, involvement, attitude, and purchase intentions. Scholars developed a conceptual model and hypotheses to reinforce the literature review on these factors.

Methodology: This study used modified scales from earlier studies that have been published in journals. With 510 respondents, the data were gathered using the snowball technique. To assess the data set, structural equation modeling was employed.

Findings: The findings of this study indicated a significant relation between designed information and novelty with perceived usefulness and involvement. Furthermore, the relationship between perceived usefulness and involvement as mediators with attitude toward product display was investigated and found to be significant.Practical

Implications: The study’s primary conclusion was that consumers’ intentions to buy clothing in physical stores may be influenced by the way different conceptions are related to one another. The findings of this research offered valuable insights to retailers, visual merchandisers, and store managers regarding the significance of designed information and novelty in product displays within apparel brick-and-mortar stores, ultimately leading to purchase intentions. This research paper pioneered the study combining product display constructs.

Originality: This study is noteworthy because of its findings, which linked planned information, novelty, perceived usefulness, involvement, attitude, and purchase intentions, expanding the product display stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) framework. Specifically, it identified perceived usefulness, involvement, and attitude toward product displays as a mediator in linking designed information, novelty, and purchase intentions.

Keywords Product Display SEM Fashion Apparel Brick-And-Mortar Stores and Mediation
How to Cite

Shweta Saini, Sanjeev Bansal (2023). Associating Designed Information and Novelty with Purchase Intentions for Product Displays in Fashion Apparel Stores. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(12), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i12/173351

References
  1. Awa, H. O., Ikwor, N. K., & Ademe, D. G. (2021). Customer satisfaction with complaint responses under the moderation of involvement. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1905217. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1905217
  2. Awang, Z., Afthanorhan, A., Mohamad, M., & Asri, M. A. M. (2015). An evaluation of measurement model for medical tourism research: The confirmatory factor analysis approach. International Journal of Tourism Policy (IJTP), 6(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTP.2015.075141
  3. Barbosa, B., & Añaña, E. (2023). The influence of Instagrammers' recommendations on healthy food purchase intention: The role of consumer involvement. Cuadernos de Gestión, 23(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.5295/cdg.221693ea
  4. Basu, R., Paul, J., & Singh, K. (2022). Visual merchandising and store atmospherics: An integrated review and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 151, 397–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.019
  5. Bell, J. A., & Ternus, K. (2022). Silent selling: Best practices and effective strategies in visual merchandising (Vol. 6). Fairchild Publications, Inc. https://books.google.com/books/about/Silent_Selling.html?id=vxqBQgAACAAJ
  6. Bigne, E., Chatzipanagiotou, K., & Ruiz, C. (2020). Pictorial content, sequence of conflicting online reviews and consumer decision-making: The stimulus-organism-response model revisited. Journal of Business Research, 115, 403–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.031
  7. Bulsara, H. P., & Vaghela, P. S. (2022). Millennials' online purchase intention towards consumer electronics: Empirical evidence from India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i2/168154
  8. Cheng, T.-m., Chang, S.-y., & Dai, Z.-P. (2015). The mediating effect of situation involvement of novelty seeking and satisfaction for Yanshuei Fireworks Festival in Taiwan. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(2), 154–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCTHR-10-2014-0084
  9. Cordes, C. (2008). A potential limit on competition. Journal of Bioeconomics, 10, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-008-9036-7
  10. Das, M., & Ramalingam, M. (2022). What drives product involvement and satisfaction with OFDs amid COVID-19? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 68, 103063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103063
  11. Dinh, T. D., & Mai, K. N. (2015). Guerrilla marketing's effects on Gen Y's word-of-mouth intention – a mediation of credibility. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2015-0102
  12. Elmashhara, M. G., & Soares, A. M. (2022). Linking atmospherics to shopping outcomes: The role of the desire to stay. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102744
  13. Friedman, D., Cycowicz, Y. M., & Gaeta, H. (2001). The novelty P3: An event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25(4), 355–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-7634(01)00019-7
  14. Fu, S., Chen, X., & Zheng, H. (2021). Exploring an adverse impact of smartphone overuse on academic performance via health issues: A stimulus-organism-response perspective. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(7), 663–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1716848
  15. Garrido-Morgado, Á., González-Benito, Ó., Martos-Partal, M., & Campo, K. (2021). Which products are more responsive to in-store displays: Utilitarian or hedonic? Journal of Retailing, 97(3), 477–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.10.005
  16. Grandi, B., Burt, S., & Cardinali, M. G. (2021). Encouraging healthy choices in the retail store environment: Combining product information and shelf allocation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, 1025522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102522
  17. Grewal, D., Roggeveen, A. L., & Nordfält, J. (2017). The future of retailing. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.008
  18. Gupta, R., & Jain, K. (2019). The impact of anthropomorphism on purchase intention of smartphones: A study of young Indian consumers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(5), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i5/144021
  19. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  20. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE India. https://in.sagepub.com/en-in/sas/a-primer-on-partial-least-squares-structural-equation-modeling-pls-sem/book244583
  21. Han, Y., Chandukala, S. R., & Li, S. (2022). Impact of different types of in-store displays on consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 98(3), 432–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.10.002
  22. Helm, S., Kim, S. H., & Van Riper, S. (2020). Navigating the 'retail apocalypse': A framework of consumer evaluations of the new retail landscape. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 101683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.09.015
  23. Hsu, S. H.-Y., Tsou, H.-T., & Chen, J.-S. (2021). “Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?” customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 62, 102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102649
  24. Huddleston, P., Behe, B. K., Minahan, S., & Fernandez, R. T. (2015). Seeking attention: An eye tracking study of in-store merchandise displays. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(6), 561–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2013-0120
  25. Hung, W.-K., & Chen, L.-L. (2012). Effects of novelty and its dimensions on aesthetic preference in product design. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 81–90.
  26. Jie, Y., & Li, Y. (2022). Chronological cues and consumers' preference for mere newness. Journal of Retailing, 98(3), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2021.11.003
  27. José Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). Role of gender on acceptance of mobile payment. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(2), 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2013-0137
  28. Juntongjin, P. (2022). Does involvement matter in S-Commerce? The integrated role of emotion to explain satisfaction and loyalty in S-commerce for low vs high involvement products. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 2104439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2104439
  29. Kaur, S., Nim, D., & Jaggi, S. (2022). Relationship between humor in advertising and attitude towards ads : A meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i3/160366
  30. Kim, D., Hyun, H., & Park, J. (2020). The effect of interior color on customers' aesthetic perception, emotion, and behavior in the luxury service. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102252
  31. Klein, A., & Sharma, V. M. (2022). Consumer decision-making styles, involvement, and the intention to participate in online group buying. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102808
  32. Kulshrestha, D., Tiwari, M. K., Shalender, K., & Sharma, S. (2022). Consumer acatalepsy towards buying behaviour for need-based goods for sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(10), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i10/172347
  33. Kumar, S., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Chakraborty, D., & Kaur, P. (2021). What drives brand love for natural products? The moderating role of household size. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102329
  34. Lai, P. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002
  35. Lee, H. (2020). Voters' involvement, attitude, and confidence in the era of new media. Palgrave Communications, 6, Article number 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0368-9
  36. Lim, X.-J., Cheah, J.-H., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Richard, J. E. (2022). Does retail type matter? Consumer responses to channel integration in omni-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102992
  37. Lu Hsu, J., & Hsien-Chen Mo, R. (2009). Consumer responses to incomplete information in print apparel advertising. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 13(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020910939888
  38. Manganari, E. E., Siomkos, G. J., & Vrechopoulos, A. P. (2009). Store atmosphere in web retailing. European Journal of Marketing, 43(9/10), 1140–1153. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560910976401
  39. Matušínská, K., & Stoklasa, M. (2022). The appeals and level of involvement influencing purchasing decision. Management & Marketing, 17(3), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2022-0013
  40. Milaković, I. K., Mihić, M., & Boljat, I. (2020). Consumer attitudes towards social network advertising: Predictors and outcomes. Market-Tržište, 32(Special Issue), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.22598/mt/2020.32.spec-issue.83
  41. Moshood, T. D., Nawanir, G., Mahmud, F., Mohamad, F., Ahmad, M. H., & AbdulGhani, A. (2022). Why do consumers purchase biodegradable plastic? The impact of hedonics and environmental motivations on switching intention from synthetic to biodegradable plastic among the young consumers. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64, 102807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102807
  42. Panda, T. K., Kumar, A., Jakhar, S., Luthra, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kazancoglu, I., & Nayak, S. S. (2020). Social and environmental sustainability model on consumers' altruism, green purchase intention, green brand loyalty and evangelism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118575
  43. Park, J., Kang, H., Huh, C., & Lee, M. J. (MJ). (2022). Do immersive displays influence exhibition attendees' satisfaction?: A stimulus-organism-response approach. Sustainability, 14(10), 6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106344
  44. Pasricha, D., & Jain, K. (2019). Antecedents affecting purchase of luxury ayurvedic skin care products. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(9), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i9/146937
  45. Pasricha, D., Jain, K., & Singh, G. (2020). Antecedents affecting the purchase intention of millennials towards luxury fashion goods: A mixed methods study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i1/149772
  46. Point of Purchase Advertising International. (2012). 2012 Shopper engagement study: Media topline report. http://www.popai.cz/files/publishing/shopper-engagement-study_5165.pdf
  47. Radon, A., Brannon, D. C., & Reardon, J. (2021). Ketchup with your fries? Utilizing complementary product displays to transfer attention to a focal product. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102339
  48. Ranganath, C., & Rainer, G. (2003). Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4, 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052
  49. Reynolds-McIlnay, R., Morrin, M., & Nordfält, J. (2017). How product–environment brightness contrast and product disarray impact consumer choice in retail environments. Journal of Retailing, 93(3), 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.03.003
  50. Richard, M.-O., & Chebat, J.-C. (2016). Modeling online consumer behavior: Preeminence of emotions and moderating influences of need for cognition and optimal stimulation level. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.010
  51. Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
  52. Singh, P., Sandhu, I., & Singh, A. I. (2023). Consumers' attitude toward electric vehicles in India : Mapping psychological antecedents and consequences. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i6/172765
  53. Smith, R., & Bush, A. J. (2002). Using the incomplete information framework to develop service provider communication guidelines. Journal of Services Marketing, 16(6), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040210443409
  54. Söderlund, M. (2022). Service robots with (perceived) theory of mind: An examination of humans' reactions. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102999
  55. tom Dieck, M. C., Jung, T. H., Kim, W. G., & Moon, Y. (2017). Hotel guests' social media acceptance in luxury hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2015-0552
  56. Tsao, W.-C., & Yang, F.-J. (2017). Factors that influence the intention to use mobile shopping platforms which feature virtual shelves and QR codes based on TAM. International Review of Management and Business Research, 6(2), 758–776.
  57. Vashist, D. (2018). Effect of product involvement and brand prominence on advergamers' brand recall and brand attitude in an emerging market context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 30(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2016-0014
  58. Wang, Y., & Sun, S. (2010). Examining the role of beliefs and attitudes in online advertising: A comparison between the USA and Romania. International Marketing Review, 27(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651331011020410
  59. Wongkitrungrueng, A., Valenzuela, A., & Sen, S. (2018). The cake looks yummy on the shelf up there: The interactive effect of retail shelf position and consumers' personal sense of power on indulgent choice. Journal of Retailing, 94(3), 280–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2018.07.001
  60. Wu, J., Won Ju, H., Kim, J., Damminga, C., Kim, H.-Y., & K. P. Johnson, K. (2013). Fashion product display: An experiment with Mockshop investigating colour, visual texture, and style coordination. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(10), 765–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-08-2012-0072
  61. Wu, K., Vassileva, J., Zhao, Y., Noorian, Z., Waldner, W., & Adaji, I. (2016). Complexity or simplicity? Designing product pictures for advertising in online marketplaces. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 28, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.08.009
  62. Yan, L., Xiaojun, F., Li, J., & Dong, X. (2019). Extrinsic cues, perceived quality, and purchase intention for private labels: Evidence from the Chinese market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 31(3), 714–727. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-08-2017-0176
  63. Yim, M. Y.-C., Lee, J. G., & Jeong, H. (2021). Exploring the impact of the physical conditions of mannequin displays on mental simulation: An embodied cognition theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 102332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102332
  64. Yoo, J., & Kim, M. (2014). The effects of online product presentation on consumer responses: A mental imagery perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2464–2472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.006
  65. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2012). Consumer involvement: Review, update and links to decision neuroscience. In V. K. Wells & G. R. Foxall (eds.), Handbook of developments in consumer behavior. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  66. Zheng, X., Baskin, E., & Dhar, R. (2019). By-brand or by-category? The effect of display format on brand extension evaluation. Journal of Retailing, 95(3), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2019.04.003
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines