Purpose: This study used the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2) model to try and find the antecedents to behavioral intention among millennials to buy smartwatches. We looked into the variables influencing millennials’ intention to acquire smartwatches because of their growing propensity to embrace and use them.

Methodology: A mixed method approach was used, with a qualitative study assisting in the identification of significant elements and a quantitative investigation (using structural equation modeling) analyzing the links that were suggested. Using AMOS 29 and Process Macro, data from 240 valid responses were used to test the hypotheses.

Findings: We discovered that behavioral intention was significantly impacted by performance expectancy, social influence, brand enthusiasm, and hedonic motivation but not significantly by effort expectancy, price value, or facilitating conditions. Additionally, the moderating influence of both gender and educational attainment was investigated.Practical

Implications: Manufacturers were advised to concentrate on the functional advantages of their products in order to draw in millennial customers. Extra effort should be made to cultivate a favorable perception among the purchasers. To improve the perception of smartwatches, brand-building campaigns had to be implemented.

Originality: In contrast to earlier studies, the current work examined consumers’ views of smartwatches by extending the UTAUT2 model.

1. Abed, S. S. (2021). Examining augmented reality adoption by consumers with highlights on gender and educational-level differences. Review of International Business and Strategy, 31(3), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/RIBS-08-2020-0100
2. Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Algharabat, R. (2018). Examining factors influencing Jordanian customers' intentions and adoption of internet banking: Extending UTAUT2 with risk. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.026
3. Arora, T., Agarwal, B., & Kumar, A. (2018). A study of millennials' preferences for social media advertising in Delhi NCR. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(10), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i10/132334
4. Bashir, M., Yousaf, A., & Verma, R. (2016). Disruptive business model innovation: How a tech firm is changing the traditional taxi service industry. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46(4), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i4/90530
5. Beh, P. K., Ganesan, Y., Iranmanesh, M., & Foroughi, B. (2021). Using smartwatches for fitness and health monitoring: The UTAUT2 combined with threat appraisal as moderators. Behaviour & Information Technology, 40(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1685597
6. Bulsara, H. P., & Vaghela, P. S. (2022). Millennials' online purchase intention towards consumer electronics: Empirical evidence from India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i2/168154
7. Carey, R. M., & Whelton, P. K. (2018). Prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: Synopsis of the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Hypertension Guideline. Annals of Internal Medicine, 168(5), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.7326/M17-3203
8. Chakraborty, D. (2021). Factors influencing passengers' purchase intention towards app-cab services in metro cities of India: A study on smartphone users. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.17010/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i1/156933
9. Chakraborty, D., & Paul, J. (2023). Healthcare apps' purchase intention: A consumption values perspective. Technovation, 120, 102481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102481
10. Chakraborty, D., Siddiqui, A., Siddiqui, M., Rana, N. P., & Dash, G. (2022). Mobile payment apps filling value gaps: Integrating consumption values with initial trust and customer involvement. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 66, 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.102946
11. Chakraborty, D., Singu, H. B., & Patre, S. (2022). Fitness apps's purchase behaviour: Amalgamation of stimulus–organism–behaviour–consequence framework (S–O–B–C) and the innovation resistance theory (IRT). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103033
12. Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
13. Chawla, D., & Joshi, H. (2020). The moderating role of gender and age in the adoption of mobile wallet. Foresight, 22(4), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2019-0094
14. Chen, K., & Chan, A. H. S. (2014). Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: A senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics, 57(5), 635–652. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2014.895855
15. Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In R. S. Valle & M. King (eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.
16. Dash, G., Akmal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2022). A study on adoption of e-health services: Developing an integrated framework in a multinational context. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(5), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i5/169415
17. Dash, G., Akmal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2023). A study on adoption of mobile learning apps (MLA): Development of an integrated framework in a multinational context. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(5), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i5/172724
18. Doukas, C., & Maglogiannis, I. (2012). Bringing IoT and cloud computing towards pervasive healthcare. 2012 sixth international conference on innovative mobile and internet services in ubiquitous computing (pp. 922–926). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMIS.2012.26
19. Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.1999.11501839
20. Erdem, T., & Keane, M. P. (1996). Decision-making under uncertainty: Capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Marketing Science, 15(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.15.1.1
21. Farooq, M. S., Salam, M., ur Rehman, S., Fayolle, A., Jaafar, N., & Ayupp, K. (2018). Impact of support from social network on entrepreneurial intention of fresh business graduates: A structural equation modelling approach. Education + Training, 60(4), 335–353. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-06-2017-0092
22. Gao, Y., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2015). An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 115(9), 1704–1723. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-03-2015-0087
23. Gilal, F.G., Gilal, N. G., Gilal, R. G., Gon, Z., Gilal, W. G., & Tunio, M. N. (2021). The ties that bind: Do brand attachment and brand passion translate into consumer purchase intention? Central European Management Journal, 29(1), 14–38. https://doi.org/10.7206/cemj.2658-0845.39
24. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). Pearson Prentice Hall.
25. Hernandez, B., Montaner, T., Sese, F. J., & Urquizu, P. (2011). The role of social motivations in e-learning: How do they affect usage and success of ICT interactive tools? Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2224–2232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.001
26. Hsiao, Y.-C., & Chen, C.-Y. (2018). Exploring individual, family, and extrafamilial factors associated with depression among elderly residents of care settings. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 86(3), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091415017699938
27. Jain, R. (2022). Impact of the pandemic on consumer behavior and business strategy in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i2/168152
28. Jung, Y., Kim, S., & Choi, B. (2016). Consumer valuation of the wearables: The case of smartwatches. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 899–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.040
29. King, C. E., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2018). A survey of smartwatches in remote health monitoring. Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research, 2, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41666-017-0012-7
30. King, R. C., Villeneuve, E., White, R. J., Sherratt, R. S., Holderbaum, W., & Harwin, W. S. (2017). Application of data fusion techniques and technologies for wearable health monitoring. Medical Engineering & Physics, 42, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.12.011
31. Kumar, N., & Singh, V. (2022). Shopping with voice assistant: Understanding consumer intention and the mediating role of trust. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(8), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i8/171224
32. Kurup, A. J., & Jain, P. (2018). Effect of e-loyalty cues on repurchase behavioural intentions among online shoppers. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(11), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i11/137982
33. Lee, E.-J. (2021). Impact of visual typicality on the adoption of wearables. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(3), 762–775. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1904
34. Li, J., Ma, Q., Chan, A. HS., & Man, S. S. (2019). Health monitoring through wearable technologies for older adults: Smart wearables acceptance model. Applied Ergonomics, 75, 162–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.10.006
35. Liebermann, Y., & Stashevsky, S. (2002). Perceived risks as barriers to Internet and e-commerce usage. Qualitative Market Research, 5(4), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750210443245
36. Lunney, A., Cunningham, N. R., & Eastin, M. S. (2016). Wearable fitness technology: A structural investigation into acceptance and perceived fitness outcomes. Computers in Human Behavior, 65, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.007
37. Mahadevan, K., & Joshi, S. (2022). Impact of e-service quality dimensions on customer satisfaction and loyalty in online apparel shopping in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(12), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i12/172560
38. Mandala, G. N., Verma, A., & Verma, M. (2022). Consumption patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 43(6), 1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2022.2122196
39. Pahari, S., Polisetty, A., Sharma, S., Jha, R., & Chakraborty, D. (2023). Adoption of AI in the banking industry: A case study on Indian banks. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i3/172654
40. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
41. Pourazad, N., Stocchi, L., & Pare, V. (2020). The power of brand passion in sports apparel brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(5), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2164
42. Schawbel, D. (2015, January 20). 10 new findings about the millennial consumer. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2015/01/20/10-new-findings-about-the-millennial-consumer/?sh=448d6f1a6c8f
43. Shamsi, M. S., Narula, S., & Sharma, A. (2022). Does environmental awareness via SNSS create sustainable consumption intention among the millennials? Journal of Content, Community & Communication, 15(8), 100–116.
44. Sharma, P., Gupta, S., & Kapoor, D. (2020). Digital marketing and consumer millennials: A comparative study of men, women, and transgender consumers' buying behaviour in Punjab. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i3/151029
45. Statista. (2022). Wearable technology — Statistics & facts. http://www.statista.com/topics/1556/wearable-technology
46. Stevens, J. P. (1992). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
47. Tak, P., & Panwar, S. (2017). Using UTAUT 2 model to predict mobile app based shopping: Evidences from India. Journal of Indian Business Research, 9(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-11-2016-0132
48. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., & Liu, X. (2014). Measuring the moderating effect of gender and age on e-learning acceptance in England: A structural equation modeling approach for an extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 51(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.51.2.b
49. Vahdat, A., Hafezniya, H., Jabarzadeh, Y., & Thaichon, P. (2020). Emotional brand attachment and attitude toward brand extension. Services Marketing Quarterly, 41(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2020.1786245
50. Vandrico Inc. (n.d.). The wearables database. https://vandrico.com/wearables
51. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
52. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
53. Verma, A., Chakraborty, D., & Verma, M. (2023). Barriers of food delivery applications: A perspective from innovation resistance theory using mixed method. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 73, 103369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103369
54. Yadav, M. (2017). Social media as a marketing tool: Opportunities and challenges. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(3), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i3/111420
55. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.08.007
56. Zailani, S., Iranmanesh, M., Nikbin, D., & Beng, J. K. C. (2015). Determinants of RFID adoption in Malaysia's healthcare industry: Occupational level as a moderator. Journal of Medical Systems, 39, Article 172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0172-4