Bundling can be defined as a combination of two or more products or services into a single offering sold at a single selling price. While introducing a new product in the market, the manufacturer can launch the product by its own or can promote through bundling with an existing product under a different brand name to leverage the brand equity of the strong brand. Prior research in bundling as a new product introduction strategy primarily focused upon the role of functional attributes on consumers' evaluation of the bundle. However, in the context of brand extension and co-branding literature, it was inferred that in addition to the functional benefits, brands also provide symbolic benefits to the consumers, and studying symbolic aspects of this strategy is very essential. Therefore, the objective of the paper was to develop and propose a model that studied the roles of symbolic (self-congruity) and functional (functional congruity) benefits on consumers' bundle purchase intention when bundling was used as a new-product introduction strategy. This study will help marketers to select their partners when they propose to use bundling as a new product introduction strategy.

1. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. New York : Free Press.
2. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. The Journal of Marketing, 54 (1), 27- 41.
3. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Building strong brands. New York : Free Press.
4. Adams, W. J., & Yellen, J. L. (1976). Commodity bundling and the burden of monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90 (3), 475 - 498.
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J : Prentice-Hall.
6. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and information-processing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 (5), 871- 880.
7. Braverman, J. (2008). Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: The moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research, 35 (5), 666 - 694.
8. Cohen, J. B. (1982). The role of affect in categorization: Toward a reconsideration of the concept of attitude. In A. Mitchell (ed)., NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 9, pp. 94 -100). Ann Abor, MI : Association for Consumer Research.
9. Das, G. (2015). Linkages between self-congruity, brand familiarity, perceived quality and purchase intention: A study of fashion retail brands. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 6 (3), 180 -193.
10. Docters, R., Schefers, B., Durman, C., & Gieskes, M. (2006). Bundles with sharp teeth: Effective product combinations. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(5), 10 -16.
11. Eppen, G. D., Hanson, W. A., & Martin, R. K. (1991). Bundling - new products, new markets, low risk. Sloan Management Review, 32 (4), 7-14.
12. Gaeth, G. J., Levin, I. P., Chakraborty, G., & Levin, A. M. (1991). Consumer evaluation of multi-product bundles: An information integration analysis. Marketing Letters, 2 (1), 47- 57.
13. Goldsmith, R. E., Lafferty, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The influence of corporate credibility on consumer attitudes and purchase intent. Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (4), 304 - 318.
14. Graeff, T. R. (1996). Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13(3), 4 - 18.
15. Han, H., & Back, K. J. (2008). Relationships among image congruence, consumption emotions, and customer loyalty in the lodging industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 32 (4), 467- 490.
16. Harris, J. (1997). The effects of promotional bundling on consumers’ evaluations of product quality and risk of purchase. In M. Brucks & D. J. MacInnis (ed.), NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 24, pp. 168 -172). Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research.
17. Harris, J., & Blair, E. A. (2006a). Consumer preference for product bundles: The role of reduced search costs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (4), 506-513.
18. Harris, J., & Blair, E. A. (2006b). Functional compatibility risk and consumer preference for product bundles. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(1), 19 - 26.
19. He, H., & Mukherjee, A. (2007). I am, ergo I shop: Does store image congruity explain shopping behavior of Chinese consumers? Journal of Marketing Management, 23(5-6), 443- 460.
20. Helmig, B., Huber, J., & Leeflang, P. H. (2008). Co-branding: The state of the art. Schmalenbach Business Review (SBR), 60 (4), 359 - 377.
21. Hung, K., & Petrick, J. F. (2011). The role of self-and functional congruity in cruising intentions. Journal of Travel Research, 50 (1), 100-112.
22. Jana, A., & Chandra, B. (2016). Role of brand image and switching cost on customer satisfaction-loyalty dyadic in the mid-market hotel sector. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46 (9), 35-52. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i9/101040
23. Johar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20 (3), 23 - 33.
24. Joji, A. N., & Varghese, A. (2016). Brand - extension price premium: An enquiry on the role of perceived fit among users of a consumer durable in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46 (8), 11-24. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i8/99290
25. Kaicker, A., Bearden, W. O., & Manning, K. C. (1995). Component versus bundle pricing: The role of selling price deviations from price expectations. Journal of Business Research, 33 (3), 231 - 239.
26. Kang, J., Tang, L., Lee, J. Y., & Bosselman, R. H. (2012). Understanding customer behavior in name-brand Korean coffee shops: The role of self-congruity and functional congruity. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3), 809 - 818.
27. Kang, J., Tang, L., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Self-congruity and functional congruity in brand loyalty. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 39 (1), 105 -131.
28. Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: building, measuring, and managing brand equity (2d ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall.
29. Khan, B. M. (2010). Brand personality and consumer congruity: Implications for advertising strategy. IUP Journal of Brand Management, 7(1-2), 7-24.
30. Khandeparkar, K. (2014). The role of complementarity and partner brand price level in new product introduction strategy using bundle offers: A study on the quality perception of bundle components. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(6), 992 -1000.
31. Kleijnen, M., De Ruyter, K., & Andreassen, T. W. (2005). Image congruence and the adoption of service innovations. Journal of Service Research, 7 (4), 343-359.
32. Kressmann, F., Sirgy, M. J., Herrmann, A., Huber, F., Huber, S., & Lee, D. J. (2006). Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59 (9), 955 - 964.
33. Kumar, V., & Nayak, J. K. (2014). The role of self-congruity and functional congruity in influencing tourists’ post visit behavior. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research, 2 (2), 24 - 44.
34. Lafferty, B. A., Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 10 (3), 1-11.
35. Mantovani, A. (2013). The strategic effect of bundling: A new perspective. Review of Industrial Organization, 42 (1), 25 - 43.
36. Martinez, E., & de Chernatony, L. (2004). The effect of brand extension strategies upon brand image. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(1), 39 -50.
37. Mason, R.S. (1981). Conspicuous consumption: A study of exceptional consumer behavior. New York, NY : St Martin’s Press.
38. Mazodier, M., & Merunka, D. (2014). Beyond brand attitude: Individual drivers of purchase for symbolic cobranded products. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1552 - 1558.
39. Mulhern, F. J., & Leone, R. P. (1991). Implicit price bundling of retail products: A multiproduct approach to maximizing store profitability. The Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 63-76.
40. Park, C. W., Milberg, S., & Lawson, R. (1991). Evaluation of brand extensions: The role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18 (2), 185 - 193.
41. Patro, S. K., & Jaiswal, A. K. (2003). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions: Evidence from India. Journal of Academy of Business and Economics, 1 (2), 170 - 179.
42. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
43. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Phillips, D. M., & Baumgartner, H. (2002). The role of consumption emotions in the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (3), 243 - 252.
45. Punyatoya, P. (2013). Consumer evaluation of brand extension for global and local brands: The moderating role of product similarity. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25 (3), 198-215.
46. Rafiei, H., Rabbani, M., Razmi, J., & Jolai, F. (2013). Product bundle pricing in the new millennium: A literature review. International Journal of Advances in Management Science, 2 (3), 109 -118.
47. Ramanathan, J., & Velayudhan, S. K. (2015). Consumer evaluation of brand extensions: Comparing goods to goods brand extensions with goods to services. Journal of Brand Management, 22 (9), 778 - 801.
48. Ranjan, R. (2009). Managing new products successfully : A strategic imperative. Indian Journal of Marketing, 39 (4), 3-8.
49. Ryu, K., Han, H., & Kim, T. H. (2008). The relationships among overall quick-casual restaurant image, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27(3), 459 - 469.
50. Sarin, S., Sego, T., & Chanvarasuth, N. (2003). Strategic use of bundling for reducing consumers’ perceived risk associated with the purchase of new high-tech products. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11(3), 71- 83.
51. Sharpe, K. M., & Staelin, R. (2010). Consumption effects of bundling: Consumer perceptions, firm actions, and public policy implications. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 29 (2), 170-188.
52. Sheinin, D. A. (1998). Positioning brand extensions: Implications for beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 7(2), 137-149.
53. Sheng, S., Parker, A. M., & Nakamoto, K. (2007). The effects of price discount and product complementarity on consumer evaluations of bundle components. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(1), 53- 64.
54. Sheng, S., & Pan, Y. (2009). Bundling as a new product introduction strategy: The role of brand image and bundle features. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16 (5), 367-376.
55. Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1995). Bundling as a strategy for new product introduction: Effects on consumers' reservation prices for the bundle, the new product, and its tie-in. Journal of Business Research, 33 (3), 219 - 230.
56. Simonin, B. L., & Ruth, J. A. (1998). Is a company known by the company it keeps? Assessing the spillover effects of brand alliances on consumer brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 30 - 42.
57. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (3), 287-300.
58. Sirgy, M. J., & Samli, A. C. (1985). A path analytic model of store loyalty involving self-concept, store image, geographic loyalty, and socioeconomic status. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13 (3), 265 - 291.
59. Sirgy, M. J., Johar, J. S., Samli, A. C., & Claiborne, C. B. (1991). Self-congruity versus functional congruity: Predictors of consumer behavior. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19 (4), 363 - 375.
60. Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., Mangleburg, T. F., Park, J. O., Chon, K. S., Claiborne, C. B., Johar, J.S., & Berkman, H. (1997). Assessing the predictive validity of two methods of measuring self-image congruence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25 (3), 229 - 241.
61. Sirgy, M. J., & Johar, J. S. (1999). Toward an integrated model of self-congruity and functional congruity. In, B. Dubois, T. M. Lowrey, L. J. Shrum, & M. Vanhuele (eds.), E-European advances in consumer research (Vol. 4, pp. 252-256). Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research.
62. Sirgy, M. J., & Su, C. (2000). Destination image, self-congruity, and travel behavior: Toward an integrative model. Journal of Travel Research, 38 (4), 340 - 352.
63. Sirgy, M. J., Grewal, D., & Mangleburg, T. (2000). Retail environment, self-congruity, and retail patronage: An integrative model and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 49 (2), 127 - 138.
64. Stremersch, S., & Tellis, G. J. (2002). Strategic bundling of products and prices: A new synthesis for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 55 - 72.
65. Sujan, M. (1985). Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 31- 46.
66. Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (1995). Effect of consumers' purchase plans on the evaluation of bundle offers. In F. R. Kardes & M. Sujan (eds). NA - Advances in consumer research (Vol. 22, pp. 588-593). Provo, UT : Association for Consumer Research.
67. Tsai, S. P. (2005). Utility, cultural symbolism and emotion: a comprehensive model of brand purchase value. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 22 (3), 277 - 291.
68. Upadhyaya, M. (2012). Influence of destination image and destination personality: An empirical analysis. Journal of Marketing and Communication, 7(3), 40 - 47.