New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Consumers’ Attitude Toward Electric Vehicles in India : Mapping Psychological Antecedents and Consequences

Pushpinder Singh1Inderpreet Sandhu2Amar Inder Singh3

1 Research Scholar, School of Management Studies, Punjabi University, NH 64, Next to Urban Estate Phase II, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Punjabi University, NH 64, Next to Urban Estate Phase II, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab

3 Professor, School of Management Studies, Punjabi University, NH 64, Next to Urban Estate Phase II, Patiala - 147 002, Punjab

Volume 53
Issue 6
Pages 8–27
Year 2023
Received: Aug. 2, 2022 Accepted: April 30, 2023 Published: June 1, 2023
Abstract

Purpose: Deteriorating air quality, rising carbon footprint, and increasing fuel prices have called for India’s automobile industry to gear up for acute transformation. The current study, drawing parallel lines from SOR theory, investigated how the attitude toward EVs was affected by three psychological antecedents—utilitarian shopping value, conspicuous consumption, and lifestyle. Further, the study examined how this attitude impacted the intention of Indian consumers to purchase an EV and their ecological behavior. Design/Methodology/Approach : The study included 382 Indian consumers of EVs who constituted the sample population. A structured questionnaire was created to gather information from this sample. The SEM (structural equation modeling) approach was applied to draw conclusions from the data.

Findings: The results indicated that out of three antecedents, only utilitarian shopping value had no significant relationship with attitude toward EVs. Also, the attitude was found to be positively related to purchase intention and ecological behavior.

Implications: Manufacturers and marketers of EVs must include lifestyle and conspicuous aspects in their offerings. Moreover, they should work on enhancing the utilitarian value of EVs. Never should a person feel that he/she is paying more than he/she is getting. Special note for conspicuous consumers who are shedding huge resources to make a statement among peers.Originality

Value: The current study was one of the prime ones to draw the impact of lifestyle, conspicuousness, and utilitarian values on attitudes toward EVs. Moreover, the current study provided a one-of-a-kind modified model of SOR theory by including unique stimuli and responses.

Keywords utilitarian shopping value lifestyle conspicuous consumption attitude toward EVs (electric vehicles) purchase intention ecological behavior
How to Cite

Pushpinder Singh, Inderpreet Sandhu, Amar Inder Singh (2023). Consumers’ Attitude Toward Electric Vehicles in India : Mapping Psychological Antecedents and Consequences. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(6), 8–27. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i6/172765

References
  1. Abdelkhair, F. Y., Babekir, M. Y., Mudawi, S. S., & Abiad, A. B. (2023). Sales promotion and impulse buying behavior towards consumer goods: The mediating role of purchase intention. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 26–42. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i2/172631
  2. Afroz, R., Masud, M. M., Akhtar, R., Islam, M. A., & Duasa, J. B. (2015). Consumer purchase intention towards environmentally friendly vehicles: An empirical investigation in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(20), 16153–16163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4841-8
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  4. Asadi, S., Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Abdullah, R., Mahmoud, M., Alkinani, M. H., & Yadegaridehkordi, E. (2021). Factors impacting consumers’ intention toward adoption of electric vehicles in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 282, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124474
  5. Asif, M., Jajja, M. S., & Searcy, C. (2021). A review of literature on the antecedents of electric vehicles promotion: Lessons for value chains in developing countries. In, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2021.3099070
  6. Axsen, J., Tyree Hageman, J., & Lentz, A. (2012). Lifestyle practices and pro-environmental technology. Ecological Economics, 82, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.013
  7. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
  8. Bahal, S., & Dave, K. (2018). Value perception of consumers towards luxury apparels and accessories: A study in Delhi/NCR region. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(5), 31–39.
  9. Barrett, P. (2007). Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 815–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018
  10. Beall, J. M., Boley, B. B., Landon, A. C., & Woosnam, K. M. (2021). What drives eco-tourism: Environmental values or symbolic conspicuous consumption? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(8), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1825458
  11. Bennett, R., & Vijaygopal, R. (2018). Consumer attitudes towards electric vehicles: Effects of product user stereotypes and self-image congruence. European Journal of Marketing, 52(3/4), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-09-2016-0538
  12. Bhattacharya, S. (2011). Consumer attitude towards green marketing in India. The IUP Journal of Marketing Management, 10(4), 62–71.
  13. Bhatti, K. K., & Negi, A. (2018). Determinants of green marketing leading to sustainable competitive advantage for retailers within the Delhi region. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(8), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i8/130540
  14. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (Multivariate applications series). Taylor & Francis Group.
  15. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.
  16. Chung, E., & Fischer, E. (2001). When conspicuous consumption becomes inconspicuous: The case of the migrant Hong Kong consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(6), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760110404378
  17. Daniel, J. (2012). Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices. Sage Publications.
  18. Dubey, V. (2022, March 08). Registered EV sales cross 1 lakh mark in 2022; Electric 2W sales grow 433%. Business Today. https://www.businesstoday.in/auto/story/registered-ev-salescross- 1-lakh-mark-in-2022-electric-2w-sales-grow-433-325131-2022-03-08
  19. Egbue, O., & Long, S. (2012). Barriers to widespread adoption of electric vehicles: An analysis of consumer attitudes and perceptions. Energy Policy, 48, 717–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.06.009
  20. Florenthal, B., & Arling, P. (2011). Do green lifestyle consumers appreciate low involvement green products? The Marketing Management Journal, 21(2), 35–45. http://www.mmaglobal.org/publications/publications-council/
  21. Fraj, E., & Martinez, E. (2006). Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(3), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760610663295
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  23. Geiger, S. M., Fischer, D., & Schrader, U. (2018). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 18–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1688
  24. Giri, A., Biswas, W., & Salo, J. (2022). ‘Buy Luxury’: Adapting the SHIFT framework to explore the psychological facets enabling consumers for sustainable luxury consumption. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(6), 59–66. http://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i6/169836
  25. Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M. (2016). Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129
  26. Gong, S., Ardeshiri, A., & Rashidi, T. H. (2020). Impact of government incentives on the market penetration of electric vehicles in Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 83, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102353
  27. Hair Jr., J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
  28. Hair, E., Halle, T., Terry-Humen, E., Lavelle, B., & Calkins, J. (2006). Children’s school readiness in the ECLS-K: Predictions to academic, health, and social outcomes in first grade. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 431–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.005
  29. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  30. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  31. Han, L., Wang, S., Zhao, D., & Li, J. (2017). The intention to adopt electric vehicles: Driven by functional and non-functional values. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.033
  32. Hawkins, D. I., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015). Consumer behavior: Building marketing strategy (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill. https://aclasites.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/consumer-behaviorbuilding-marketing-strategy-11th-edition.pdf
  33. Heffetz, O. (2011). A test of conspicuous consumption: Visibility and income elasticities. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1101–1117. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00116
  34. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  35. Issac, A. P., Mathew, A. O., & Sriram, K. V. (2022). Drivers of purchase intention - hedonic or utilitarian values? A case of Indian electric car market. International Journal of Business Excellence, 27(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2022.123517
  36. Jain, R. (2022). Impact of the pandemic on consumer behavior and business strategy in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i2/168152
  37. Jansson, J., Nordlund, A., & Westin, K. (2017). Examining drivers of sustainable consumption: The influence of norms and opinion leadership on electric vehicle adoption in Sweden. Journal of Cleaner Production, 154, 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.186
  38. Johnson, C. M., Tariq, A., & Baker, T. L. (2018). From Gucci to green bags: Conspicuous consumption as a signal for pro-social behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 26(4), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2018.1487769
  39. Khurana, A., Kumar, V. V., & Sidhpuria, M. (2020). A study on the adoption of electric vehicles in India: The mediating role of attitude. Vision, 24(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262919875548
  40. Kock, N., (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 11(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
  41. Kourav, V., & Sharma, A. (2023). Exploring success factors for new product selling in fastmoving consumer goods. Indian Journal of Marketing, 53(3), 8–25. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2023/v53/i3/172653
  42. Laheri, V. K. (2020). Moderating effect of facilitators and barriers for purchase of green products in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 50(3), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2020/v50/i3/151026
  43. Linge, A., Singh, M., Kakde, B., & Punjani, K. K. (2022). Application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict college students online purchase intention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(12), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i12/172561
  44. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1(2), 130–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.2.130
  45. Maloney, M. P., Ward, M. P., & Braucht, G. N. (1975). A revised scale for the measurement of ecological attitudes and knowledge. American Psychologist, 30(7), 787–790. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084394
  46. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.562
  47. Mohd Suki, N. (2013). Young consumer ecological behavior: The effects of environmental knowledge, healthy food, and healthy way of life with the moderation of gender and age. Management of Environmental Quality, 24(6), 726–737. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-02-2013-0010
  48. Noel, L., Brodie, J. F., Kempton, W., Archer, C. L., & Budischak, C. (2017). Cost minimization of generation, storage, and new loads, comparing costs with and without externalities. Applied Energy, 189, 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.060
  49. Noel, L., Sovacool, B. K., Kester, J., & de Rubens, G. Z. (2019). Conspicuous diffusion: Theorizing how status drives innovation in electric mobility. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 154–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.11.007
  50. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. In, B. B. Wolman (eds.), Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2490-4_4
  51. Oliver, J. D., & Rosen, D. E. (2010). Applying the environmental propensity framework: A segmented approach to hybrid electric vehicle marketing strategies. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(4), 377–393. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679180405
  52. Picot-Coupey, K., Krey, N., Huré, E., & Ackermann, C.-L. (2021). Still work and/or fun? Corroboration of the hedonic and utilitarian shopping value scale. Journal of Business Research, 126, 578–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.018
  53. Premi, H., Sharma, M., & Dangayach, G. S. (2021). Green marketing: A systematic literature review. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(8), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i8/165761
  54. Roy Chaudhuri, H., Mazumdar, S., & Ghoshal, A. (2011). Conspicuous consumption orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 10(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.364
  55. Saldanha, A. T., & Aranha, R. (2022). Influence of consumers’ self perception on devaluation of ugly produce – Marketing strategies to reduce food waste in the Indian context. Indian Journal of Marketing, 52(8), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2022/v52/i8/171223
  56. Saxena, S., Gopal, A., & Phadke, A. (2014). Electrical consumption of two-, three- and fourwheel light-duty electric vehicles in India. Applied Energy, 115, 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.043
  57. Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 48, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004
  58. Shafiei, E., Leaver, J., & Davidsdottir, B. (2017). Cost-effectiveness analysis of inducing green vehicles to achieve deep reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.032
  59. Shukla, P. R., Dhar, S., Pathak, M., & Bhaskar, K. (2014). Electric vehicles scenarios and a roadmap for India. UNEP DTU Partnership. https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/104752085/Electric_Vehicle_Scenarios_and_a_Roadmap_for_India_upload.pdf
  60. Singh, J., Singh, G., Kumar, S., & Mathur, A. N. (2021). Religious influences in unrestrained consumer behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102262
  61. Smith, A. M. (2012). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. Elsevier Science. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.nepr.2011.11.008
  62. SIAM. (2020). Performance of the Automobile industry in 2019–2020. Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers. https://www.siam.in/uploads/ar/22-22ndAnnual%20Report%202019-20.pdf
  63. SMEV. (2020). EV sales knowledge center. Society of Manufacturers of Electric Vehicles. https://www.smev.in/ev-sales
  64. Soroka, A., & Wojciechowska-Solis, J. (2019). Consumer motivation to buy organic food depends on lifestyle. Foods, 8(11), 581. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8110581
  65. Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
  66. Tang, Y., Wang, X., & Lu, P. (2014). Chinese consumer attitude and purchase intent towards green products. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(2), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2013-0037
  67. Tobler, C., Visschers, V. H., & Siegrist, M. (2011). Eating green. Consumers’ willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors. Appetite, 57(3), 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2011.08.010
  68. Trigg, A. B. (2001). Veblen, Bourdieu, and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Economic Issues, 35(1), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342
  69. Varshneya, G., & Das, G. (2016). Antecedents and consequences of Indian consumers’ attitude towards organic clothing purchase. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 8(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEM.2016.079788
  70. Veneri, O., Ferraro, L., Capasso, C., & Iannuzzi, D. (2012). Charging infrastructures for EV: Overview of technologies and issues. In, 2012 Electrical Systems for Aircraft, Railway and Ship Propulsion, 2012, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESARS.2012.6387434
  71. Von Essen, E., & Englander, M. (2013). Organic food as a healthy lifestyle: A phenomenological psychological analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3402/qhw.v8i0.20559
  72. Wee, C. S., Ariff, M. S., Zakuan, N., Tajudin, M. N., Ismail, K., & Ishak, N. (2014). Consumers perception, purchase intention and actual purchase behavior of organic food products. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 3(2), 378–397. http://vwww.sibresearch.org/uploads/3/4/0/9/34097180/riber_b14-173_378-397.pdf
  73. Xu, G., Wang, S., & Zhao, D. (2021). Transition to sustainable transport: Understanding the antecedents of consumer’s intention to adopt electric vehicles from the emotional research perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(16), 20362–20374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-12006-1
  74. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298805200302
  75. Zhang, X., Wang, K., Hao, Y., Fan, JL, & Wei, Y.M. (2013). The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China. Energy Policy, 61, 382–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.114
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines