A recent trend in Indian advertisements is that marketers deliberately send messages through advertisements to question the century old Indian conventional practices and challenge the stereotypes. The present study attempted to do a comparative analysis between the effectiveness of advertisements with unconventional messages with that of normal advertisements. In this study, the hierarchy of effects model (Lavidge & Steiner, 1961) was used for measuring the effectiveness of the advertisements which added some unconventional flavours in the ads and delivered messages to break norms. An empirical study based on one-group pre-test post-test experiment was done in June - July 2018, where several unconventional advertisements were shown along with other conventional advertisements among a group of 115 viewers. A structured questionnaire having established scales was utilized to measure the effectiveness of unconventional advertisements in terms of three dimensions of hierarchy of effects model - cognitive component (awareness, knowledge) ; affective component (liking, preference) ; and conative component (conviction, purchase). Data were analyzed with the help of Excel and SPSS by using statistical techniques like mean, standard deviation, ranking, regression analysis, Z - test, and ANOVA. The results confirmed that there were significant differences observed in case of all three dimensions along with ad appeal, ad recall, ad references, message impact between the advertisements with unconventional messages and normal advertisements. In summary, the influence of unconventional messages added in the advertisements improved the perception of the brands, enhanced consumers' attitudes towards social issues, and particularly increased the effectiveness of the advertisements, and their scores were higher than that of normal advertisements.

1. Aaker, D. A., Myers, J.G., & Batra, R. (1995). Advertising management. Englewood Cliffs : Prentice Hall.
2. Alex, N. J., & Thomas, J. (2014). Brand credibility and purchase intention among users of shopping and convenience goods: The moderating role of brand involvement. Indian Journal of Marketing, 44 (4), 17 - 24. doi: 10.17010/ijom/2014/i4/80386
3. Amos, C., Holmes, G., & Strutton, D. (2008). Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser effects and advertising effectiveness : A quantitative synthesis of effect size. International Journal of Advertising, 27(2), 209-234. doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2008.11073052
4. Ang, S. H., Lee, Y. H., & Leong, S. M. (2007). The ad creativity cube: Conceptualization and initial validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35 (2), 220 - 232. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0042-4
5. Bendixen, M. T. (1993). Advertising effects and effectiveness. European Journal of Marketing, 27 (10), 19 - 32. doi.org/10.1108/03090569310045861
6. Bovee, C.L., Thill, J.V., Dovel, G.P., & Wood, M.B. (1995). Advertising excellence. New York, NY : McGraw - Hill.
7. Eisend, M., Plagemann, J., & Sollwedel, J. (2014). Gender roles and humor in advertising: The occurrence of stereotyping in humorous and non - humorous advertising and its consequences for advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 43 (3), 256 - 273. doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.857621
8. Furnham, A., & Paltzer, S. (2010). The portrayal of men and women in television advertisements: An updated review of 30 studies published since 2000. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51 (3), 216 - 236.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00772.x
9. Goldberg, M. E., & Hartwick, J. (1990). The effects of advertiser reputation and extremity of advertising claim on advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 172 - 179. doi.org/10.1086/208547
10. Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. International Journal of Advertising, 35(5), 761 - 770. doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1203556
11. Kaur, B., & Sharma, R. R. (2018). Impact of viral advertising on product promotion : An experimental study. Indian Journal of Marketing, 48(6), 57 - 68. doi: 10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i6/127837
12. Lavidge, R. J., & Steiner, G. A. (1961). A model for predictive measurement of advertising effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 25(6), 59 - 62. doi: 10.2307/1248516
13. Lutz, R. J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude toward the ad: A conceptual framework. In L. Alwitt & A. Mitchell (eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects : Theory, research and application (pp. 45 - 65). Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Messmer, D. J., & Johnson, R. R. (1993). Inquiry conversion and travel advertising effectiveness. Journal of Travel Research, 31(4), 14-21. doi.org/10.1177/004728759303100403
15. Siegel, W., & Ziff - Levine, W. (1990). Evaluating tourism advertising campaigns: Conversion vs. advertising tracking studies. Journal of Travel Research, 28(3), 51 - 55. doi:10.1177/004728759002800312
16. Singh, J. (2017). Are celebrity endorsements worth it? Evidence from listed firms in India. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47 (11), 36 - 47. doi: 10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i11/119295
17. Smith, R. E., Chen, J., & Yang, X. (2008). The impact of advertising creativity on the hierarchy of effects. Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 47 - 62. doi: 10.2753/JOA0091-3367370404
18. Strong, J.R., & Edward, K. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition. Psychological Review, 19(6), 447 - 462. doi.org/10.1037/h0069812
19. Venkataraman, N., & Raman, S. (2016). Impact of user-generated content on purchase intention for fashion products: A study on women consumers in Bangalore. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46 (7), 23 - 35. doi: 10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i7/97125
20. Venkatesan, M., & Losco, J. (1975). Women in magazine ads: 1959 - 1971.Journal of Advertising Research, 15 (5), 49 - 54.
21. Walsh, G., Shiu, E., & Hassan, L.M. (2014). Cross - national advertising and behavioral intentions : A multilevel analysis. Journal of International Marketing, 22(1), 77 - 98. doi.org/10.1509/jim.13.0091
22. Wells, W.D. (2000). Recognition, recall and rating scales. Journal of Advertising Research, 40 (6), 14 - 20.
23. Yeh, J. - T., & Lin, C. - L. (2010). Measuring the effectiveness of advertisements sent via mobile phone : Implications of the appeal, endorser, and involvement model and purchasing behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 38 (2), 249 - 256. doi 10.2224/sbp.2010.38.2.249