Meghalaya, home to three major tribal groups - the Khasis, the Jaintias and the Garos, is known for its handicrafts. The tribes of Meghalaya are known for weaving artistically designed products that not only have local demand, but also attract tourists. The present study aims at understanding the nature of the handicraft market of the state, and the marketing practices and strategies adopted to position the products. A survey, using a structured schedule, was conducted to ascertain the position of handicrafts marketing in Meghalaya. The survey revealed that cane and bamboo products have the highest demand followed by wooden products. The survey also showed that the market for handicrafts has not yet been optimally tapped. Unorganized structure of the market, unavailability of adequate quantity of quality raw materials, lack of credit, ineffective marketing channels, lack of proper pricing policy and advertising tools have impeded the growth of the handicraft sector. Realizing the importance of developing the industry to generate revenue and employment, the Government of Meghalaya has taken initiatives to organize the artisans into societies and clusters. Training facilities, financial and marketing assistance are also provided by the Government to the craftsmen. There are opportunities galore. The present study indicates that development of efficient marketing channels and implementation of effective marketing strategies can carve a niche market for the handicraft products of Meghalaya globally.

1. Aithal, K. R. (2012). “Marketing Channel Length in Rural India: Influence of the External Environment and Rural Retailer Buyer Behaviour.” International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 40 (3), pp. 200-217.
2. Arora, P., (2011). “India: Innovation in Rural Marketing.” Retrieved from
3. <a href=http://www.brandchannel.com/images/papers/522_2011-03_India_Rural_Marketing.pdf target="_blank">http://www.brandchannel.com/images/papers/522_2011-03_India_Rural_Marketing.pdf</a>
4. Arshad, Md., & Reza, S. (2012). “Socio-Economic Benefits Derived by Poor Rural Producers from Bamboo Value Chain Up-gradation: A study of Tripura, Northeast India.” Indian Streams Research Journal, 2 (4), pp. 1-4. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.isrj.net/publishArticles/785.pdf target="_blank">http://www.isrj.net/publishArticles/785.pdf</a>
5. Barber, T., & M. Krivoshlykova (2006). “Global Market Assessment for Handicrafts.” USAID Report, Volume I, Final Draft, pp. 1-64, Retrieved from <a href=pdf.usaid.gov/pdfdocs/PNADN210.pdf target="_blank">pdf.usaid.gov/pdfdocs/PNADN210.pdf</a>
6. UNESCO (1997). “Building Confidence: Crafts for Development.” Definition adopted by the UNESCO/ITC Symposium "Crafts and the International Market: Trade and Customs Codification." October 6 - 8, 1997, Manila, Retrieved from <a href=http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-industries/crafts-and-design/ target="_blank">http://www.unesco.org/new/en/culture/themes/creativity/creative-industries/crafts-and-design/</a>
7. Dash, M. (2011). “Marketing of Orissa Handicrafts: A Study on Challenges & Opportunities.” EXCEL International Journal of Multidisciplinary Management Studies, 1 (2), pp. 47-63.
8. Giron, J. D. I. P. H., Hernandez, M. L. D., & Castaneda, M.C.J.C.J. (2007). “Strategy and Factors for Success: The Mexican Handicraft Sector.” Performance Improvement, 46 (8), pp. 16-26. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.154.
9. Kashyap, P., & Raut, S. (2006). “The Rural Marketing Book.” Biztantra Publications, New Delhi.
10. Kotler, P. (2003). “Marketing Management.” Thomson Press (India) Ltd., New Delhi.
11. Lassar, W., Mittal, B., & Sharma, A. (1995). “Measuring Customer Based Brand Equity.” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 12 (4), pp. 11-19.
12. Mutua, K., Massimo, S. K., & Mburu, P.T. (2004). “An Empirical Study of the Botswana Handicraft Market.” Journal of African Business, 5 (2), pp. 93-112.
13. Raju, T.K., & Ranganath, N.S. (2010). “Marketing of Handicrafts - A Case Study of Brass Items Manufacturing Units in Srikakulam District of Andhra Pradesh.” Indian Journal of Marketing, 40 (9), pp. 48-54.
14. Shahi, S., & Kachhipati, C.P. (1999). “Collective Marketing: The Case of Handicrafts in Nepal.” Mountain Enterprise and Infrastructure MEI Case Study Series, NO 99/3 International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal, 1999, pp. 1-103, Retrieved from <a href=http://books.icimod.org/index.php/search/publication/307 target="_blank">http://books.icimod.org/index.php/search/publication/307</a>
15. Statistical Handbook of Meghalaya, 2010-2011, p. 72.