New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

Quantifying the Relative Importance of Key Drivers of Landing Page

P. K. Viswanathan1T. N. Swaminathan2

1 Professor - Analytics, Great Lakes Institute of Management, NPL, Devi Building, 111, L.B.Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041, Tamil Nadu

2 Professor - Marketing, Great Lakes Institute of Management, NPL, Devi Building, 111, L.B.Road, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041, Tamil Nadu

Volume 47
Issue 11
Pages 24–35
Year 2017
Received: May 8, 2017 Accepted: Oct. 11, 2017 Published: Nov. 1, 2017
Abstract

In the world of Internet surfing, the first impression of a webpage is formed by the quality of its Landing Page. It is important as it drives the visitor's perception of the contents of the website. It influences visitors to make a purchase, sign up for a newsletter, or do any other activity that may be the purpose of the site. In e-commerce / commercial portals, triggering click to action (CTA) has become all the more important. This study aimed to assess the key drivers or attributes responsible for enhancing the quality of the landing page as well as for triggering click to action (CTA) through preference decomposition approach. Each page consists of various elements or combinations of elements such as title, body, font face, background theme or color, etc. This research study attempted to quantify the relative importance of the key attributes that would maximize the click through rate (CTR) apart from attracting visitors to the page and influence them to traverse through the webpage or website entirely. It emerged from our study that high colour impact (31.57%), image in banner (26.31% ), relevant theme (15.78%), and flashing relevant ads (15.78% ), in that order, were the key drivers.

Keywords Landing Page Click to Action (CTA) Click Through Rate (CTR) E-Commerce Website
How to Cite

P. K. Viswanathan, T. N. Swaminathan (2017). Quantifying the Relative Importance of Key Drivers of Landing Page. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(11), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i11/119294

References
  1. Ash, T. (2008). Landing page optimization. Hoboken, NJ : John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  2. Avery, C. (2005). Only screen deep? Evaluating aesthetics, usability, and satisfaction in informational websites (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida). Retrieved from <a href=http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0000465/Avery_Carrie_L_200505_MA.pdf target="_blank">http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0000465/Avery_Carrie_L_200505_MA.pdf</a>
  3. Booth, J. (2006). Can multivariate tests reduce your shopping cart abandons? Real-life results. Retrieved from <a href=https://www.marketingsherpa.com/article/case-study/can-multivariate-tests-reduce-your target="_blank">https://www.marketingsherpa.com/article/case-study/can-multivariate-tests-reduce-your</a>
  4. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6). Retrieved from <a href=http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972 target="_blank">http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972</a>
  5. Dhote, T., & Zahoor, D. (2017). Framework for sustainability in E - commerce business models : A perspective based approach . Indian Journal of Marketing, 47 (4), 35 - 50. doi:10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i4/112681
  6. DiNucci, D., Giudice, M., & Stiles, L. (2000). Elements of web design. Berkeley, CA : Peachpit Press.
  7. Ensor, B. (2007). The UK’s nationwide puts its members first: A case study in experience - based differentiation. Cambridge, MA : Forrester Research.
  8. Farhan, M., & Yousaf, A. (2016). Exploring factors affecting the effectiveness of web-advertising. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46(8), 51 - 57. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i8/99295
  9. Gofman, A. (2007). Consumer driven multivariate landing page optimization: Overview, issues, and outlook. Transactions on Internet Research, 3 (2), 7- 9.
  10. Gofman, A., Moskowitz, H. R., & Mets, T. (2009). Integrating science into web design: Consumer - driven web site optimization. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26 (4), 286 - 298.
  11. Hofacker, C. F., & Murphy, J. (2009). Consumer web page search, clicking behavior and reaction time. Direct Marketing: An International Journal, 3 (2), 88 - 96.
  12. Hoffman, D.L., & Novak, T.P. (1996). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations. Journal of Marketing, 60 (3), 50 - 68.
  13. Holmqvist, K., Holsanova, J., Barthelson, M., & Lundqvist, D. (2003). Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. Mind, 2 (3), 657 - 670.
  14. Lam, S.Y., Chau, A.W.L., & Wong, T.J. (2007). Thumbnails as online product displays : How consumers process them. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21 (1), 36 -59.
  15. Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C., & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a first good impression ! Behaviour & Information Technology, 25 (2), 115-126.
  16. Lynch, P., & Horton, S. (2001). Interface design web style guide basic design principles for creating web sites (2nd ed, pp. 17-35). New Haven : Yale University.
  17. Menon, S., & Kahn, B.E. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the internet shopping experience. Journal of Retailing, 78 (1), 31 - 40.
  18. Montgomery, A.L., Li, S., Srinivasan, K., & Liechty, J.C. (2004). Modeling online browsing and path analysis using clickstream data. Marketing Science, 23 (4), 579- 595.
  19. Nielson, J. (2000). Designing web usability. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders.
  20. O’Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is Web 2.0. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html target="_blank">http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html</a>
  21. Prasad, S., & Sharma, M. (2016). Demographic and socioeconomic influences shaping usage of online channel for purchase of food & grocery. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46(10), 7-21. doi:10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i10/102851
  22. Rajan, C. R., Swaminathan, T.N., & Pavithra, M. (2017). Key drivers of purchase intent by Indian consumers in omni-channel shopping. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(5), 7- 20. DOI: 10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i5/114233
  23. Temkin, B. (2007, June 17). Experience - based differentiation. Retrieved from <a href=https://experiencematters.blog/2007/06/17/experience-based-differentiation/ target="_blank">https://experiencematters.blog/2007/06/17/experience-based-differentiation/</a>
  24. White, K. (2006). How high is your bounce rate? Retrieved from <a href=http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/how-high-isyour-bounce-rate/2006/02/09/ target="_blank">http://newsletter.blizzardinternet.com/how-high-isyour-bounce-rate/2006/02/09/</a>
  25. Yoo, C. Y., Kim, K., & Stout, P. A. (2004). Assessing the effects of animation in online banner advertising: Hierarchy of effects model. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 4 (2), 49 - 60.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines