New IJM now accepts submissions exclusively via the Editorial Scholar portal — a dedicated submission & review system.
Go to Editorial Scholar →
Associated Management Consultants Pvt. Ltd. | COPE Member · ID: JM07589
Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE ABDC: C |
Indian Journal of Marketing logo

Indian Journal of Marketing

ISSN: 0973-8703 Frequency: Monthly Peer Review: Double-blind Published since: 1968 Language: English
A publication of AMCPL
amcon.co.in
New Delhi, India
Indexed in: Scopus Q3 UGC-CARE Group II ABDC: C Google Scholar J-Gate NAAS NISCAIR Crossref

Original Article

Open Access Original Article

The Impact of Proficiency of Marketing Activities and Value Proposition Innovation on New Intelligent Products' Performance

M. S. Shashishekar1Sandip Anand2

1 Ph.D. Scholar, Xavier Institute of Management Bhubaneshwar, Xavier University, XIMB Campus, Xavier Square, Bhubaneswar – 751 013, Odisha

2 Professor, Xavier Institute of Management Bhubaneshwar, Founding Associate Dean, Doctoral Programs, Xavier University, XIMB Campus, Xavier Square, Bhubaneswar – 751 013, Odisha

Volume 49
Issue 12
Pages 7–20
Year 2019
Received: Oct. 2, 2019 Accepted: Nov. 17, 2019 Published: Dec. 31, 2019
Abstract

Industrial products' manufacturing businesses are experiencing a change due to emerging need for intelligent products. Intelligent products are a new archetype of products having two layers. The first layer contains the classical hardware products augmented with intelligence on second layer. Intelligent products have a built in human-machine interface to interact with end users. Development and monetization of new intelligent products is a challenge as they subtly move the product business towards the solution business. Hence, it is critical to understand the determinants influencing new intelligent product performance in the market. The study synthesized the literature related to classical, intelligent products that identified marketing activities' proficiency and value proposition innovation as key variables critical for new intelligent product performance. The study was conducted during the year 2018–2019, collected data from 54 respondents having managed development and monetization of 42 new intelligent products launched during the years 2011-2017 belonging to 32 business units. It empirically validated the structural relationships between marketing activities' proficiency, value proposition innovation, and new intelligent product performance. The study deciphered that marketing activities' proficiency influenced the new intelligent product performance through value proposition innovation. It offered an empirical framework to attain unique value propositions and superior new intelligent product performance. The study suggested the practitioners to deploy a mechanism integrated with marketing activities and value proposition innovation to evolve unique value propositions. It also offered a unique framework of marketing activities' proficiency and value proposition innovation in the context of new intelligent product performance for further investigation by academicians.

Keywords Marketing Proficiency Value Propositions New Product Performance Intelligent Products
How to Cite

M. S. Shashishekar, Sandip Anand (2019). The Impact of Proficiency of Marketing Activities and Value Proposition Innovation on New Intelligent Products' Performance. Indian Journal of Marketing, 49(12), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2019/v49/i12/149107

References
  1. Aghazadeh, H. (2015). Strategic marketing management: Achieving superior business performance through intelligent marketing strategy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207(21), 125-134.
  2. Allmendinger, G., & Lombreglia, R. (2005). Four strategies for the age of smart services. Harvard Business Review, 83(10), 131-145.
  3. Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90-99.
  4. Ballantyne, D., Frow, P., Varey, R. J., & Payne, A. (2011). Value propositions as communication practice : Taking a wider view. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 202-210.
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., & Thompson, R. (1995). The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling : Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration (with commentaries). Technology Studies, 2(2), 285-324.
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
  7. Bashir, M., Yousaf, A., & Verma, R. (2016). Disruptive business model innovation: How a tech firm is changing the traditional taxi service industry. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46 (4), 49-59. <a href=https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i4/90530 target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i4/90530</a>
  8. Baur, C., & Wee, D. (2015). Manufacturing's next act. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/manufacturings-next-act target="_blank">http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/manufacturings-next-act</a>
  9. Blankson, C., Cowan, K., Crawford, J., Kalafatis, S., Singh, J., & Coffie, S. (2013). A review of the relationships and impact of market orientation and market positioning on organisational performance. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 21(6), 499-512.
  10. Bloch, M., Pigneur, Y., & Segev, A. (1996). On the road of electronic commerce - A business value framework. Gaining competitive advantage and some research issues. Paris: Université de Lausanne, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales/Institut L'Informatique et Organisation.
  11. Bower, M., & Garda, R. A. (1985). The role of marketing in management. McKinsey Quarterly, 3(1), 34-46.
  12. Buurman, R. D. (1997). User-centred design of smart products. Ergonomics, 40(10), 1159-1169.
  13. Camlek, V. (2010). How to spot a real value proposition. Information Services & Use, 30(3-4), 119-123.
  14. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529-555.
  15. Clauss, T. (2017). Measuring business model innovation: Conceptualization, scale development, and proof of performance. R&D Management, 47(3), 385-403.
  16. Cronin, M. J. (2010). Smart products, smarter services : Strategies for embedded control. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
  17. Dawid, H., Decker, R., Hermann, T., Jahnke, H., Klat, W., König, R., & Stummer, C. (2017). Management science in the era of smart consumer products: Challenges and research perspectives. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 25(1), 203-230.
  18. Dillon, T. A., Lee, R. K., & Matheson, D. (2005). Value innovation: Passport to wealth creation. Research - Technology Management, 48(2), 22-36.
  19. Dubey, P., Bajpai, N., & Guha, S. (2016). Mapping customer delight by using a surprise model. Indian Journal of Marketing, 46(10), 22-39. <a href=https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i10/102852 target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2016/v46/i10/102852</a>
  20. Eisend, M., Evanschitzky, H., & Calantone, R. J. (2016). The relative advantage of marketing over technological capabilities in influencing new product performance: The moderating role of country institutions. Journal of International Marketing, 24(1), 41-56.
  21. Främling, K., Holmström, J., Loukkola, J., Nyman, J., & Kaustell, A. (2013). Sustainable PLM through intelligent products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(2), 789-799.
  22. Frow, P., & Payne, A. (2011). A stakeholder perspective of the value proposition concept. European Journal of Marketing, 45(1/2), 223-240.
  23. Gummerus, J. (2013). Value creation processes and value outcomes in marketing theory: Strangers or siblings ? Marketing Theory, 13(1), 19-46.
  24. Guo, C., Wang, Y. J., Hao, A. W., & Saran, A. (2018). Strategic positioning, timing of entry, and new product performance in business-to-business markets : Do market-oriented firms make better decisions ? Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 25(1), 51-64.
  25. Habib, M. K. (2007). Mechatronics - A unifying interdisciplinary and intelligent engineering science paradigm. IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 1(2), 12-24.
  26. Hair, F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) : An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121.
  27. Harmancioglu, N., Droge, C., & Calantone, R. J. (2009). Strategic fit to resources versus NPD execution proficiencies: What are their roles in determining success? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 266-282.
  28. Hinterhuber, A., & Snelgrove, T. C. (2016). Value first then price : Quantifying value in business to business markets from the perspective of both buyers and sellers. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  29. Hsieh, M. H., Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. R. (2008). The moderating effects of market orientation and launch proficiency on the product advantage-performance relationship. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), 580-592.
  30. Hudadoff, P. (2009). The customer value proposition : Differentiation through the eyes of your customer. Applied Product Marketing LLC. Retrieved from <a href=http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~marchese/stese/reading2.pdf target="_blank">http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~marchese/stese/reading2.pdf</a>
  31. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20 (2), 195-204.
  32. Johnson, G., Scholes, K., & Whittington, R. (2008). Exploring corporate strategy : Text & cases. Pearson Education.
  33. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1-18.
  34. Kok, R. A., Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. G. (2003). What makes product development market oriented ? Towards a conceptual framework. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(02), 137-162.
  35. Kowalkowski, C., Ridell, O. P., Röndell, J. G., & Sörhammar, D. (2012). The co-creative practice of forming a value proposition. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(13-14), 1553-1570.
  36. Langerak, F., Hultink, E. J., & Robben, H. S. (2004). The impact of market orientation, product advantage, and launch proficiency on new product performance and organizational performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 79-94.
  37. Lanning, M. J. (1998). Delivering profitable value. Cambridge: Perseus Books Group.
  38. Lapierre, J. (2000). Customer-perceived value in industrial contexts. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15(2/3), 122-145.
  39. Ledwith, A., & O'Dwyer, M. (2008). Product launch, product advantage and market orientation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(1), 96-110.
  40. Levitt, T. (1981). Marketing intangible products and product intangibles. Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 22(2), 37-44.
  41. Lindič, J., & Marques da Silva, C. (2011). Value proposition as a catalyst for a customer focused innovation. Management Decision, 49(10), 1694-1708.
  42. Lucke, D., Constantinescu, C., & Westkämper, E. (2008). Smart factory - A step towards the next generation of manufacturing. In, Manufacturing Systems and Technologies for the New Frontier (pp. 115-118). London : Springer.
  43. Masood, R. Z. (2010). Challenge to business-changes in India's marketing environment. Indian Journal of Marketing, 40(2), 29-34.
  44. Meyer, G. G., Främling, K., & Holmström, J. (2009). Intelligent products: A survey. Computers in Industry, 60(3), 137-148.
  45. Mühlhäuser, M. (2007). Smart products: An introduction. In, European Conference on Ambient Intelligence (pp. 158-164). Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer.
  46. Murthy, D. N., & Kumar, B. V. (2015). Internet of things (IoT): Is IoT a disruptive technology or a disruptive business model ? Indian Journal of Marketing, 45(8), 18-27. <a href=https://dx.doi.org/0.17010/ijom/2015/v45/i8/79915 target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/0.17010/ijom/2015/v45/i8/79915</a>
  47. Nunes, M.L., Pereira, A. C., & Alves, A. C. (2017). Smart products development approaches for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1215-1222.
  48. Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160-172.
  49. Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017). The customer value proposition: Evolution, development, and application in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(4), 467-489.
  50. Richards, K. A., & Jones, E. (2008). Customer relationship management: Finding value drivers. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(2), 120-130.
  51. Rijsdijk, S. A., Hultink, E. J., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2007). Product intelligence: Its conceptualization, measurement and impact on consumer satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(3), 340-356.
  52. Savić, N., Pitić, G., & Trbovich, A. S. (2016). Smart, connected products as a new competitive advantage : Challenges for Serbia. Ekonomika Preduzeća, 64(1-2), 143-155.
  53. Schmitt, B. (1999). Experiential marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(1-3), 53-67.
  54. Sharma, S., & Verma, R. (2017). Extent of market orientation of commercial banks in Punjab. Indian Journal of Marketing, 47(10), 26-41.
  55. <a href=https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i10/118695 target="_blank">https://dx.doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2017/v47/i10/118695</a>
  56. Slater, S. F., & Narver, J. C. (2000). Intelligence generation and superior customer value. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 120-127.
  57. Yang, X., Moore, P., & Chong, S. K. (2009). Intelligent products: From lifecycle data acquisition to enabling productrelated services. Computers in Industry, 60(3), 184-194.
  58. Zhang, J., & Duan, Y. (2010). The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance : Evidence from Chinese manufacturers. Management Decision, 48(6), 849-867.
Editorial Scholar

Submit your Research to IJM

Submit your Manuscript → Author Guidelines